Back

Sex-Specific Correlates of Schistosoma haematobium Infection in a Rural Zambian Setting: A pilot study Focusing on Immune and Hematological Factors

Phiri, R.; Luwaya, E. L.; Chisompola, D.; Chakulya, M.; Siame, L.; Mweene, B. C.; Hamooya, B. M.; Chalwe, J. M.; Povia, J. P.; Masenga, S. K.

2025-12-09 pathology
10.64898/2025.12.08.25341872 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThis study aimed to identify and compare the sex-specific immune, hematological, and environmental factors associated with Schistosoma haematobium infection in a rural Zambian setting. MethodsThis community-based cross-sectional study enrolled participants from rural Zambia. Schistosoma haematobium infection was diagnosed microscopically from urine. Blood samples were analyzed for complete blood counts and cytokines via ELISA. Data were analyzed using sex-stratified logistic regression models in StatCunch. ResultsThe analysis included 51 male and 92 female participants. In the multivariate model, for males, only lack of clean water (aOR=0.04, 95% CI; 0.00-0.60, p=0.0194) and symptomatic disease (aOR=68.10, 95% CI; 4.64-1000.29, p=0.0021) remained independent correlates of schistosomiasis infection. For females, the final model identified symptomatic disease (aOR=2155.53, 95% CI; 2.11-2198049.30, p=0.0299), elevated IL-4 (aOR=1.02, 95% CI; 1.01-1.03, p=0.0035), lower hemoglobin (aOR=0.17, 95% CI; 0.03-0.87, p=0.0336), and a lower platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (aOR=0.97, 95% CI; 0.93-1.00, p=0.0489) as significant independent correlates. ConclusionThe correlates of schistosomiasis infection are highly sex specific. While environmental exposure is a key driver for males, the female profile is characterized by a pronounced immunological response, including a Th2-skewed cytokine profile and associated hematological manifestations like anemia. These findings underscore the necessity for sex-differentiated approaches in both the clinical assessment and public health control of schistosomiasis.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.