Risks of Subsequent Primary Extracolonic Cancers for Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Study Protocol for the Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model
Aung, Y. K.; Jenkins, M.; Baxter, N. N.; Win, A. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe risk of developing a second cancer following colorectal cancer poses a significant challenge for colorectal cancer survivors, as 10-20% of survivors experience a subsequent primary cancer. These additional diagnoses are significantly associated with lower survival rates and increased morbidity compared with those who do not develop a subsequent primary cancer. Identifying survivors at the highest risk for subsequent primary cancers is imperative for preventive strategies and surveillance. This study protocol outlines the development and internal and external validation of risk prediction models, estimating individual risks of subsequent extracolonic cancer (cancers outside the colon and rectum) over 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year periods. MethodsThis study will include adult patients aged 18 years or older with a history of invasive colon, rectal, or colorectal cancer diagnosed within one year prior to recruitment; at least one year of follow-up post-recruitment; no prior nonskin cancers; and no genetic predispositions, such as Lynch syndrome. Data will be sourced from the Colon Cancer Family Registry Cohort, which recruits participants from population-based cancer registries. The primary outcome is the first diagnosis of a subsequent primary extracolonic cancer, excluding metastases or recurrence of any primary cancer. Candidate predictors will include sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, lifestyle factors, clinicopathological factors, and hormonal factors such as menopausal status and hormone use (in women). Initial predictor selection will be performed using five methods: backward stepwise elimination via flexible parametric regression, Cox regression, Fine and Gray subdistribution hazard regression, Lasso Cox regression, and elastic net regression. Predictive performance will be assessed through accuracy measures, discrimination (C and D statistics), R2 statistics, and calibration plots to select the best-performing final model. Internal validation will involve bootstrapping 500 samples to estimate optimism-corrected C statistics. We will calculate individualized risks for subsequent extracolonic cancer at 3-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year intervals using shrinkage-adjusted beta coefficients of the selected predictors in the final model, along with baseline hazards derived from two approaches--one that accounts for death as a competing risk, and one that does not. External validation will be performed by testing the final model on an independent cohort from the Melbourne Collaborative Cohort Study. DiscussionThis model may help clinicians identify colorectal cancer survivors at increased risk of subsequent extracolonic cancers, enabling early detection, lifestyle modifications, and personalized screening strategies. Early intervention could subsequently reduce morbidity and improve long-term outcomes for these colorectal cancer survivors.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Ability of known colorectal cancer susceptibility SNPs to predict colorectal cancer risk: A cohort study within the UK Biobank 93%
- Southern European Prospective Investigation Into Childhood Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC kids ): Study Design and Protocol 92%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Patterns of peritoneal dissemination and response to systemic chemotherapy in common and rare peritoneal tumors treated by cytoreductive surgery: Study protocol of a prospective, multi-center, observational study 92%
- The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and related control measures on cancer diagnosis in Catalonia:A time-series analysis of primary care electronic health records covering about 5 million people. 91%
- Cohort-based association study of germline genetic variants with acute and chronic health complications of childhood cancer and its treatment: Genetic risks for childhood cancer complications Switzerland (GECCOS) study protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer and the risk of COVID-19 diagnosis, hospitalisation, and death: a population-based multi-state cohort study including 4,618,377 adults in Catalonia, Spain 93%
- Novel mammogram-based measures improve breast cancer risk prediction beyond an established mammographic density measure 92%
- Circulating white blood cell traits and colorectal cancer risk: A Mendelian randomization study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- A new colorectal cancer risk prediction model incorporating family history, personal and environmental factors 92%
- The Multiethnic Cohort: A Resource for the study of Genetic and non-Genetic Cancer Risk Across Populations 92%
- A Quantitative Framework to Study Potential Benefits and Harms of Multi-cancer Early Detection Testing 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 94%
- Identification of patients at risk for pancreatic cancer in a 3-year timeframe based on machine learning algorithms 91%
- Novel ratio-metric features enable the identification of new driver genes across cancer types 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.