Understanding the Barriers and Enablers of Pharmacogenetics Testing in Primary Care in Singapore: A Qualitative Study
Saparamadu, A. A. D. N. S.; Iyalomhe, O. E.; Sam Xin Hui, X. H.; Chow, A.; Sun, S.; Smith, H. E.
Show abstract
Pharmacogenetic testing promises safer, personalized prescribing, yet its adoption in primary care in Singapore remains limited and underexplored. The aim of this study was to, 1) examine perceptions, attitudes, and beliefs about pharmacogenetic testing among primary care physicians (PCPs) and patients in Singapore, and 2) to compare acceptability between those who did and did not participate in a prior pharmacogenetic feasibility study. We conducted one-to-one semi-structured interviews with a purposive sample of 10 PCPs (6 had joined an earlier feasibility study) and 15 patients (7 previously tested with pharmacogenetic testing). Interviews (mean=35 minutes) were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically by three investigators. Ethical approval was obtained (IRB2019-07-035). Five principal themes emerged: 1) Perceptions of acceptability and test accuracy--broad support for pharmacogenetics to reduce trial-and-error prescribing but persistent concerns about result reliability and medico-legal risk; 2) Appropriate financial context--cost sensitivity in Singapore with expectations for government subsidies and incentives for PCPs; 3) Physician education and communication--variable pharmacogenetic expertise, perceived inadequacy of training, need for expert support, and challenges explaining probabilistic results to patients; 4) Integration into clinical records--frustration with standalone pharmacogenetic software and a desire for EMR integration; 5) Data privacy and insurance implications--concerns about insurer access and potential premium and eligibility impacts. No significant attitude differences were observed between participating and non-participating PCPs. Patients and PCPs generally favor pharmacogenetic testing in primary care but identify actionable barriers, cost, training, and data integration and safeguards, that must be addressed to support implementation in Singapore.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative exploration of barriers to efficient and effective Structured Medication Reviews in Primary Care: Findings from the DynAIRx study 95%
- What constitutes 'poor' adherence to medical advice for chronic diseases? Insights from a qualitative study among hypertension and diabetes patients in urban informal settlements, Mumbai Metropolitan Region 94%
- Wading through Molasses: A qualitative examination of the experiences, perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge of Australian medical practitioners regarding medical billing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing focused practice: A qualitative study of resident and early-career family physician practice choices 93%
- Are Dutch General Practitioners willing to prescribe mifepristone and misoprostol?: a mixed-methods study 92%
- Implementation of predictive risk stratification to reduce emergency admissions to hospital: experiences of general practitioners and practice managers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Practical barriers and facilitators experienced by patients, pharmacists and physicians to the implementation of pharmacogenomic screening in Dutch outpatient hospital care – an explorative pilot study 95%
- Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: A Delphi Study 93%
- The Contribution of Pharmacogenetic Drug Interactions to 90-Day Hospital Readmissions: Preliminary Results from a Real-World Healthcare System 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 92%
- Risks of use and non-use of antibiotics in primary care. Qualitative study of prescribers' views 92%
- Protocol for a qualitative study exploring the experiences and perceptions of dolutegravir/lamivudine dual antiretroviral therapy (the PEDAL Study) in people living with HIV 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Acceptability of fixed-dose combination treatments for hypertension in Kenya: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Framework of Acceptability 95%
- Healthcare Consumers’ Perceptions of Incentive-Linked Prescribing: A Scoping Review of Research 93%
- Evaluating the implementation of weekly rifapentine-isoniazid (3HP) for tuberculosis prevention among people living with HIV in Uganda: A qualitative evaluation of the 3HP Options Trial 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.