Back

Genomic Evidence for Revising Management Units of European Anchovy: Integrating Evolutionary Lineages into Fisheries Assessment

del Rio, A.; Diaz-Arce, N.; Santos-Mocoroa, M.; Ibaibarriaga, L.; Garrido, S.; Rodriguez-Ezpeleta, N.

2025-12-05 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2025.12.05.692497 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Effective fisheries management requires stock boundaries that accurately reflect underlying biological populations. In European anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus), defining management units has been complicated by a complex evolutionary history and the coexistence of distinct ecotypes. Despite recent advances using high-resolution genomic markers, key uncertainties persist regarding population structure and connectivity, particularly between the Bay of Biscay and Atlantic Iberian Waters stocks and their links to neighboring northern and southern regions. Here, we analyze thousands of genetic markers from individuals spanning both assessed stocks and adjacent areas, including representatives of the two recognized ecotypes (marine and coastal). Our comprehensive population genomic analyses identify three major lineages, northern marine, southern marine, and coastal, shaped by historical processes and ecological differentiation. Notably, genetic divergence between ecotypes exceeds that observed among geographically distant populations within the same ecotype, highlighting the need to incorporate ecological as well as spatial drivers when delineating stocks. Our findings demonstrate that current management units do not capture the underlying biological structure of European anchovy, which could lead to local overexploitation due to inadequate Total Allowable Catch (TAC) settings. This study emphasizes the need to incorporate genetic data when defining biologically relevant management units, with the goal of improving stock assessments, safeguarding adaptive potential, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the species.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Evolutionary Applications
91 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.4%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.4%
3
Molecular Ecology
304 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
7.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
5
Molecular Ecology Resources
161 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
6
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
7
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
8
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Journal of Fish Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
10
BMC Ecology and Evolution
49 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
11
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
12
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
14
Conservation Genetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Aquaculture
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
16
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
19
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.8%
20
Viruses
318 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
21
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.7%
22
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
23
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%