Back

Increased grain weight conferred by GW2 mutations in wheat does not translate into yield gains in multi-year field trials of near-isogenic lines

Simmonds, J.; Crane, P.; Eade, S.; Montemayor-Lara, A.; Kerton, M.; Bird, N.; Tailby, P.; Jackson, P.; Warner, D.; Hayes, C.; Schafer, D.; Uauy, C.

2025-12-08 plant biology
10.64898/2025.12.04.692284 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple studies have identified genes affecting grain morphology, yet their capacity to deliver yield gains under field conditions remains unclear. We performed a multiyear, multilocation factorial evaluation of GRAIN WIDTH2 (TaGW2) mutants in hexaploid wheat using BC4 near-isogenic lines, sowing-density treatments and semi-dwarfing RHT1 backgrounds. Loss-of-function mutations in TaGW2 increased grain size and thousand grain weight (TGW) additively; with the aaBBDD single mutant showing the most stable singlelocus effect, while the aabbdd triple mutant achieved ~20% higher TGW across twelve field trials. However, overall grain yield remained unchanged or slightly reduced, reflecting a compensatory trade-off with grain number. Spike phenotyping of both main and secondary tillers showed comparable increases in TGW and spike yield despite fewer grains per spike, indicating that limited yield gain primarily reflects reduced spike number per unit area rather than decreased spike-level productivity. Effects were stable across sowing densities, whereas interactions with semi-dwarfing alleles were allele-specific: RHT-B1b partially suppressed TGW gains and accentuated yield penalties, whereas RHT-D1b maintained the large-grain phenotype and productivity. Across experiments, the TaGW2-A1D1 double mutant increased TGW (~14%) while maintaining yield stability, identifying it as a promising genotype for breeding. We conclude that TaGW2 is a reliable modifier of grain size but not yield in isolation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
14.4%
2
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.4%
3
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.7%
5
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.2%
6
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
50% of probability mass above
7
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.2%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 39%
3.5%
10
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
11
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.5%
12
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.0%
13
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 30%
1.8%
14
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Genetics
225 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
17
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
18
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.2%
19
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
21
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
23
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
24
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
25
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%