MetaPointFinder: Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance-Conferring Point Mutations (ARMs) from Metagenomic Reads
Zomer, A. L.; Nooij, S.; Carter, C.; Mather, A. E.
Show abstract
BackgroundMany clinically important antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes such as fluoroquinolones and rifamycins are driven by antimicrobial resistance-conferring mutations (ARMs) in conserved chromosomal loci (e.g., gyrA, parC, rpoB). Resistome profiling by metagenomics sequencing is often proposed as an ideal AMR surveillance tool as it is organism-agnostic, but currently, existing metagenomic AMR surveillance pipelines are only able to identify acquired AMR genes but not point mutations associated with AMR. This is a serious gap in metagenomics-based AMR surveillance, as the true extent of AMR may be underestimated. MethodsWe developed MetaPointFinder (v1), a read-based method that can process both long and short metagenomic reads. The tool identifies resistance-determining regions in reads using DIAMOND (translated protein) and KMA (nucleotide), and classifies known resistant versus wild-type variants by aligning the sequences using pwalign and assessing the observed mutations based on known resistance mutations in the AMRFinderPlus database. The tool outputs ARMs per read, per gene and per antibiotic class. ResultsIn proof-of-concept analyses, MetaPointFinder identified known AMR-associated mutations and quantified resistant/susceptible read counts and ratios from metagenomic samples with corroborating phenotypic resistance data when available. We benchmark our tool using simulated reads from DNA and from reverse-translated protein references with read lengths of 100-5000 bp and error rates between 0 and 30%, simulating both Illumina and Nanopore error rates. We show that MetaPointFinder outperforms any available method for detection of ARMs in metagenomics data. ConclusionMetaPointFinder complements gene-centric resistome profiling by capturing chromosomal mutation-based AMR directly from metagenomes. Impact StatementMany clinically important antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotypes such as fluoroquinolones and rifamycins are driven by antimicrobial resistance-conferring mutations (ARMs) in conserved chromosomal loci (e.g., gyrA, parC, rpoB). Resistome profiling by metagenomic sequencing is ideal for AMR surveillance, but existing pipelines detect only acquired genes and ignore point mutations. MetaPointFinder bridges this gap. The tool accurately identifies reads carrying resistance-determining regions using DIAMOND (protein) and KMA (DNA), aligns them, and classifies resistant versus wild-type variants using known mutations from the AMRFinderPlus database.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- PathoGFAIR: a collection of FAIR and adaptable (meta)genomics workflows for (foodborne) pathogens detection and tracking 96%
- IDseq - An Open Source Cloud-based Pipeline and Analysis Service for Metagenomic Pathogen Detection and Monitoring 96%
- A high-throughput multiplexing and selection strategy to complete bacterial genomes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MinION Sequencing of colorectal cancer tumour microbiomes - a comparison with amplicon-based and RNA-Sequencing 95%
- Comparative evaluation of bioinformatic tools for virus-host prediction and their application to a highly diverse community in the Cuatro Cienegas Basin, Mexico 95%
- An accurate and interpretable model for antimicrobial resistance in pathogenic Escherichia coli from livestock and companion animal species 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- UltraSEQ: a universal bioinformatic platform for information-based clinical metagenomics and beyond 95%
- Nested PCR to optimize rpoB metabarcoding for low-concentration and host-associated bacterial DNA 95%
- Rapid nanopore metagenomic sequencing and predictive susceptibility testing of positive blood cultures from intensive care patients with sepsis 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.