Cardiovascular Risk After Cancer in Patients with Ischemic Heart or Peripheral Artery Disease
Larsen, T. B.; Flyckt, R. N.; Henriksen, M. H. B.; Brasen, C. L.; Hansen, T. F.; Skjoth, F.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo quantify 1-year risks of cardiovascular death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) after cancer diagnosis in patients with pre-existing ischemic heart disease (IHD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD), and to identify clinical predictors of early vascular events in this high-risk population. Approach and ResultsUsing nationwide Danish registries, we identified 91,253 patients with IHD and/or PAD who developed a first primary cancer between 2002 and 2022. Competing-risk methods were used to estimate 1-year cumulative incidences of cardiovascular outcomes, and multivariable Cox models assessed associations with baseline clinical predictors. One-year cumulative incidences were 2.4 percent for cardiovascular death, 2.8 percent for MACE, and 1.8 percent for VTE, with substantial variation across cancer types. Neurologic, respiratory, and digestive cancers showed the highest vascular event rates. Prior stroke, myocardial infarction, and higher comorbidity burden were strong predictors of MACE, while previous VTE strongly predicted recurrent thrombosis. Statin therapy was associated with lower cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.66) and fewer MACE events (HR 0.84). ConclusionCancer diagnosis in patients with established atherosclerotic disease is followed by a substantial burden of early cardiovascular and thrombotic events. Distinct risk profiles across malignancy types and the protective association of statins highlight the relevance of vascular biology in shaping early outcomes and support continued use of guideline-directed preventive therapies during cancer care.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between prostate cancer and myocardial infarction management and post-infarction outcomes: A Norwegian registry study 94%
- Heart disease mortality in cancer survivors: A population-based study in Japan 94%
- Causes of death in people with cardiovascular disease: a prospective UK Biobank cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supervised exercise training in patients with cancer during anthracycline-based chemotherapy to mitigate cardiotoxicity – a randomized controlled trial 91%
- Polygenic risk, lifestyle, and cardiovascular mortality: a prospective population-based UK Biobank study 91%
- Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and treatment compliance after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in France, the STOP SCA+ study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial of high sensitivity cardiac troponin I-guided combination angiotensin receptor blockade and beta-blocker therapy to prevent anthracycline cardiotoxicity: the Cardiac CARE trial 91%
- Contemporary Burden of Cardiovascular Disease in Pregnancy: Insights from a Real-World Pregnancy Electronic Health Record Cohort 90%
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting the risk of motor vehicle crash in the first year after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation 90%
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 89%
- Place and causes of acute cardiovascular mortality during the COVID19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study of 580,972 deaths in England and Wales, 2014 to 2020 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative Effectiveness of Second-line Antihyperglycemic Agents for Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Large-scale, Multinational, Federated Analysis of the LEGEND-T2DM Study 90%
- Antithrombotic Therapy in COVID-19: Systematic Summary of Ongoing or Completed Randomized Trials 89%
- Prevalence and Impact of Myocardial Injury in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19 Infection 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.