Understanding Purchasing Patterns of Alcoholic, Alcohol-Free, and Low-Alcohol Drinks: A Latent Profile Analysis
Rousham, O.; Stevely, A. K.; Holmes, J.
Show abstract
BackgroundAlcohol-free and low-alcohol (no/lo) drinks ([≤]1.2% ABV) are increasingly popular in high-income countries. Their potential to reduce alcohol-related harm depends on who buys them, in what quantity, and their incorporation into overall drinking patterns. We aimed to (i) compare characteristics of purchases containing only no/lo drinks, only alcoholic drinks, or both, over time between 2018 and 2023; (ii) identify subgroups with distinct purchasing patterns in 2023; and (iii) describe purchasing and soiodemographic differences between these subgroups. DesignLatent profile analysis of cross-sectional household purchasing data. SettingGreat Britain, 2018 and 2023. ParticipantsNationally representative samples of 30,401 (2018) and 28,254 (2023) households. 4,975 households who purchased no/lo drinks in 2023 were included in the latent profile analysis. MeasurementsData included off-trade (i.e. shop) purchases categorised into: no/lo-only; alcohol-only; or no/lo alongside alcohol. Household characteristics were frequency of each purchase type; standard servings of no/lo drinks per adult; alcohol risk levels based on weekly units of alcohol purchased per adult in household (non-drinker: 0 units; low-risk:[≤] 14 units; increasing risk: >14[≤] 35 units; high-risk: >35 units [1 unit = 8g alcohol]); household age; social class; region; and ethnicity. FindingsFrom 2018 to 2023, the proportion of purchases that were alcohol-only fell from 97% (95% CI: 97%-97%) to 95% (CI: 95%-95%) while no/lo-only purchases rose from 1.4% (CI: 1.3%-1.4%) to 2.7% (CI: 2.7%-2.8%) and no/lo alongside alcohol purchases rose from 1.2% (CI: 1.2%-1.2%) to 1.9% (1.9%-2.0%). In 2023, no/lo-only purchases contained fewer servings (median = 6.9) than no/lo alongside alcohol purchases (median = 6.5 plus 24.5 alcohol units) and alcohol-only purchases (median = 24.6 units). No/lo-only purchases occurred earlier in the week, no/lo alongside alcohol purchases peaked on Fridays and Saturdays. Latent profile analysis identified three classes: (i) no/lo triers (53%) averaged 2.1 no/lo servings per adult annually with 95% purchasing no or low-risk levels of alcohol. (ii) Occasional purchasers (34%) averaged 7.5 servings with 20% purchasing alcohol at increasing or high-risk levels. (iii) Dual purchasers (13%) averaged 37.8 servings with 39% purchasing alcohol at increasing or high-risk levels. Dual purchasers and occasional purchasers were older than no/lo triers (60% [p<0.001], 54% [p=0.010], and 49% 55 years respectively). Dual and occasional purchasers were more often white than no/lo triers (97% [p = 0.014], 97% [p=0.0074], 94% respectively). ConclusionsIn Great Britain, most households purchasing no/lo drinks do so infrequently and purchase alcohol at low-risk levels; however, a smaller group of older, higher-risk households purchase no/lo drinks more frequently.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating the lagged effect of price discounting: a time-series study using transaction data of sugar sweetened beverages 92%
- Youth susceptibility to tobacco use: Is it general or specific? 91%
- Assessing the impact of a mandatory calorie labelling policy in out-of-home food outlets in England on consumer behaviour: a natural experimental study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prevalence and characteristics of hazardous and harmful drinkers receiving general practitioners’ brief advice on and support with alcohol consumption in Germany: results of a population survey 94%
- Interrupted time series analyses to assess the impact of alcohol control policy on socioeconomic inequalities in mortality in Lithuania: a study protocol 92%
- Smoking in social housing among adults in England, 2015-2020: a nationally representative survey 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- At home and online during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic and the relationship to alcohol consumption in a national sample of U.S. adults 94%
- Can alcohol consumption in Germany be reduced by alcohol screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in primary health care? Results of a simulation study 93%
- Investigating the added value of biomarkers compared with self-reported smoking in predicting future e-cigarette use: Evidence from a longitudinal UK cohort study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of later trading hours for bars and clubs on alcohol-related ambulance call-outs and crimes in Scotland: a controlled interrupted time series study 95%
- Changes in energy content of menu items at out-of-home food outlets in England after calorie labelling policy implementation: a pre-post analysis (2021-2022) 91%
- Food Deserts and Food Insecurity in Indian Medical Colleges: A Mixed Methods Study Exploring Myths and Realities 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.