Noninvasive enrichment of circulating tumor biomarkers in a mouse model of diffuse midline glioma using focused ultrasound
Zhang, D.; Yue, Y.; Gong, Y.; Yang, L.; Xu, K.; Yuan, J.; Chen, H.
Show abstract
BackgroundDiagnosing diffuse midline glioma (DMG) through invasive tissue biopsies is challenging due to the tumors eloquent location at the pons. Liquid biopsies offer a promising noninvasive alternative; however, their limited detection sensitivity and lack of information on the source of biomarkers pose great challenges. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of using focused ultrasound (FUS) with microbubbles to enrich circulating DMG tumor biomarkers in blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) using a mouse model. MethodsMurine DMG cells, transfected with enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) and firefly luciferase (Fluc) genes, were orthotopically injected into the mouse brain. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to guide FUS targeting of the DMG tumor. Droplet digital PCR assays were developed to detect circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and RNA (ctRNA) of EGFP and Fluc in blood and CSF samples collected after FUS. ResultsFUS enhanced the plasma levels of EGFP ctRNA by 5.4-fold (p=0.0112), compared with liquid biopsy without FUS. CSF EGFP ctDNA was increased by 2.5-fold (p=0.0253), and Fluc ctDNA was increased by 2.6-fold (p=0.0253) with FUS. No brain tissue damage was associated with FUS sonication. ConclusionsThis study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of FUS in enriching tumor biomarkers in blood and CSF in a mouse model of DMG. The enrichment ratio for circulating biomarkers depends on the source (plasma vs. CSF), analyte type (ctDNA vs. ctRNA), and individual marker (EGFP vs. Fluc). These findings support the potential future application of FUS to advance the diagnosis of DMG through liquid biopsy. Key pointsO_LIddPCR assays were developed to detect plasma and CSF ctDNA and ctRNA in a mouse model of DMG C_LIO_LIFUS with microbubbles enriched ctDNA and ctRNA in the blood and CSF of a mouse model of DMG C_LIO_LIThe enrichment ratio on circulating biomarkers is dependent on the source (plasma vs. CSF), analyte type (ctDNA vs. ctRNA), and individual marker (EGFP vs. Fluc) C_LI Importance of the studyLiquid biopsy via detecting circulating tumor biomarkers holds enormous clinical value in the diagnosis of diffuse midline glioma (DMG), where the eloquent location of the tumor poses significant risks to invasive surgical tissue biopsies. However, the effectiveness of liquid biopsy is hindered by its low sensitivity and the lack of information about the source of biomarkers. This study demonstrated that noninvasive and spatially targeted FUS treatment can release tumor-derived DNA and RNA into the blood and CSF in a mouse model of DMG. This study also found that the enrichment effect of FUS on circulating biomarkers depends on the source (plasma vs. CSF), analyte type (ctDNA vs. ctRNA), and individual marker (EGFP vs. Fluc). This study opens new avenues for advancing noninvasive DMG diagnosis through FUS-enhanced liquid biopsy (sonobiopsy).
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MRI-Guided Focused Ultrasound Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Increases Drug Delivery and Efficacy in a Diffuse Midline Glioma Mouse Model 97%
- Early prognostication of overall survival for pediatric diffuse midline gliomas using MRI radiomics and machine learning 93%
- MRI Elastography Identifies Regions of Extracellular Matrix Reorganization Associated with Shorter Survival in Glioblastoma Patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Focused Ultrasound Augments the Delivery and Penetration of Model Therapeutics into Cerebral Cavernous Malformations 94%
- Enhanced capillary delivery with nanobubble-mediated blood-brain barrier opening and advanced high resolution vascular segmentation 94%
- ImmunoPET-informed sequence for focused ultrasound-targeted mCD47 blockade controls glioma 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.