Back

Development of the invertebrate faunas of anthropogenic habitats

Sammy, J. M.; Hatfield, J. H.; Salisbury, A.; Thomas, C. D.

2025-12-05 ecology
10.64898/2025.12.02.691838 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimWe aimed to determine the relationships between species association with humans, their levels of habitat specialisation, and the extent to which their geographic ranges have increased or decreased. LocationGreat Britain. Time periodPresent (1981-2020) Major taxa studiedTerrestrial invertebrates (n=1,722 species). MethodsWe determined the habitat associations for each of 1,722 species from 14 taxonomic groups in each of 18 land cover types in Great Britain. We used these values to calculate a human association index (based on whether species occupy human-modified land cover types, such as urban, suburban and coniferous plantation habitats, or occur in relatively unmodified land covers, such as several coastal habitats and marshlands) and habitat specialisation index (whether they are restricted to a few land cover types, or widely distributed across different land cover types) for each species. We then investigated the relationship between human association and habitat specialisation, as well as the relationship between human association and two metrics of range change between 1981-2000 and 2001-2020. ResultsContrary to previous hypotheses, we find no evidence that species associated with human-modified environments are more likely to be habitat generalists. Furthermore, human-associated species were more likely to increase. On average, the geographic distributions of the most human-associated third of species increased by 58% over the study period, whereas the least human associated third of species declined by 7.1%. Main conclusionsHumans have had increasingly large impacts on the worlds ecosystems, generating an intensity gradient of human-modification, including novel (anthropogenic) environments. Our findings show that new environments have provided opportunities for species to colonise, generating faunas which include species that have become human-associated specialists. The ongoing expansions of species in ecosystems with relatively high levels of human modification are key components of the future of biodiversity in the Anthropocene.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Ecography
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.2%
2
Biological Conservation
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.7%
3
Animal Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
4
Diversity and Distributions
26 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
5
Biodiversity and Conservation
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.1%
6
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
7
Conservation Science and Practice
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.8%
50% of probability mass above
8
Conservation Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
9
Global Ecology and Biogeography
41 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
10
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 43%
3.0%
12
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
13
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
14
Conservation Letters
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.7%
16
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
17
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
18
Global Ecology and Conservation
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.6%
19
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
20
Journal of Animal Ecology
63 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
21
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
22
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
23
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
24
Biotropica
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
25
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
26
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.7%
27
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.7%
28
Landscape Ecology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
29
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
30
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%