Back

IMPACT - Phase Ib Trial of Intramuscular Personalized Neoantigen Synthetic Long Peptide Vaccines in Patients with Advanced Melanoma and Renal Cell Carcinoma

Pakvisal, N.; Wongkongkathep, P.; Bunrasmee, W.; Sodsai, P.; Siriluksana, J.; Boonnak, N.; Sangcharoen, T.; Trakarnsanga, B.; Sukprakun, S.; Wantanasiri, P.; Chotirosniramit, K.; Phanichkrivalkosil, M.; Nanthawong, S.; Chanchaem, P.; Mankhong, S.; Kumpunya, S.; Supabphol, S.; Sirijun, N.; Kongtragulsub, K.; Pearngam, P.; Somparn, P.; Payne, D. M.; Reynolds, A.; Zhao, B.; Praphanphoj, V.; Pornputtapong, N.; Sriswasdi, S.; Wichadakul, D.; Uttamapinan, S.; Angspatt, P.; Wongchanapat, P.; Teeyapun, N.; Luangdilok, S.; Sitthideatphaiboon, P.; Susiriwatananont, T.; Zungsontiporn, N.; Parinyanitikul,

2025-12-02 oncology
10.64898/2025.12.02.25341434 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeTo evaluate safety and immunogenicity of intramuscularly delivered personalized neoantigen synthetic long peptide (SLP) vaccines in patients with advanced solid tumors. Patients and MethodsIn this Phase I trial, 12 patients with advanced melanoma (n=9) or renal cell carcinoma (n=3) who could no longer access further standard treatments received intramuscular neoantigen SLP vaccines with poly-ICLC. Each vaccine contained [~]20 predicted neoantigen peptides. Adverse events were monitored throughout vaccination and follow-up. Immune profiling was performed at baseline and predefined post-vaccination time points. ResultsIntramuscular neoantigen vaccination was well tolerated, with only grade 1-2 local pain or fever and no immune-mediated toxicities. All participants developed de novo T-cell responses, detectable within one week. On average, 46% of peptides per patient were immunogenic, inducing both CD8 and CD4 neoantigen-specific responses. Patients previously treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had higher baseline immunity but achieved comparable post-vaccination responses to ICI-naive patients. IFN-{gamma}-dominant CD8 and TNF--dominant CD4 responses were observed, along with increased effector memory differentiation. Two patients with higher CD8 TEMRA proportions were the longest survivors. Tumor biopsies revealed enhanced CD8 infiltration, and epitope spreading occurred in one of two evaluable cases. Analysis of 239 peptides showed greater immunogenicity for dual MHC I/II-binding, cysteine-containing, and in-frame indel- or low-VAF-derived mutations, while proline substitutions reduced responses. ConclusionsIntramuscular neoantigen SLP vaccination with poly-ICLC is safe and induces rapid, mutation-specific T-cell immunity with robust CD8 effector responses. These findings support intramuscular administration as a promising strategy for peptide-based cancer vaccines. Translational relevancePersonalized neoantigen vaccines offer a promising strategy to enhance tumor-specific immunity, but most prior studies using intradermal or subcutaneous delivery have shown limited induction of cytotoxic CD8 T cells. This study demonstrates that intramuscular administration of personalized neoantigen synthetic long peptide vaccines with poly-ICLC is safe, feasible, and capable of eliciting rapid, mutation-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell responses in patients with advanced melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Vaccine-induced immunity was dominated by IFN-{gamma}-producing cells and accompanied by a shift toward effector memory phenotypes. In selected cases, post-treatment tumor biopsies revealed increased CD8 infiltration. These findings support intramuscular delivery as a practical and effective platform for neoantigen-based cancer vaccine.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
37.1%
2
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.3%
3
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
4
New England Journal of Medicine
50 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
6
Cancer Immunology Research
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 47%
2.1%
8
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.9%
9
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
16 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
11
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
12
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.5%
14
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
15
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
16
Annals of Oncology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
17
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
18
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
19
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
20
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
22
OncoImmunology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.9%
24
Molecular Therapy
71 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
27
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 75%
0.7%
28
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
29
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 68%
0.7%
30
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%