Oncologists' Experiences with Patient Death - a Qualitative Interview Study
Gandras, M.; Michalski, M.; Wandke, S.; Rutenkroeger, M.; Scholl, I.
Show abstract
ImportanceFrequent exposure to patient death may challenge oncologists well-being and compromise care quality. Despite these risks, evidence on how patient death affects oncologists across different healthcare settings remains limited. ObjectiveTo explore how patient death affects oncologists, focusing on personal and professional impact, coping strategies, and perceived support and educational needs. DesignQualitative study based on semi-structured telephone interviews conducted in 2024, analyzed using deductive-inductive content analysis. SettingInterviews with oncologists from various specialties, working in inpatient and outpatient adult cancer care settings across Germany. ParticipantsOncologists working within the German health care system with experience of at least one patient death were eligible to participate. Participants were recruited using purposive maximum-variation sampling. None withdrew after enrollment. The sample included a range of clinical roles and levels of experience. Intervention(s) or Exposure(s)Cross-sectional observational study without intervention. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s)Participants descriptions of personal and professional effects of patient death, their coping strategies, and their reported support and educational needs. ResultsThe sample included 23 oncologists (13 male) from diverse oncological specialties. Participants reported a wide range of personal and professional responses to patient death, from no impact to significant distress, but also described experiences of personal and professional growth. Emotional responses included sadness and helplessness, but also feelings of relief and satisfaction. Lasting effects, including shifts in clinical approach and life perspective but also adverse outcomes such as difficulty separating work from private life were reported. Common coping strategies included peer support, clinical reflection, professional distancing, and both team-based and individual rituals. Barriers to coping included taboos around death, blame dynamics, time constraints and unclear access to institutional support. While many reported no current unmet needs, the findings nonetheless revealed gaps in medical education and a demand for low-threshold support formats. Conclusions and RelevancePatient death can have lasting personal and professional impact on oncologists. Interventions addressing educational gaps and providing low-threshold support may help strengthen oncologists well-being and sustain care quality. Trial RegistrationNot applicable (qualitative observational study). Key pointsO_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSHow do oncologists experience and cope with patient death, and what support needs do they perceive? FindingsIn this qualitative interview study, oncologists described a wide range of personal and professional effects of patient death. Coping strategies included informal peer support, clinical reflection, professional distancing, and both team-based and individual rituals. While many participants reported no unmet support needs, the findings nonetheless revealed gaps in medical education and a demand for low-threshold support formats. MeaningPatient death can have lasting personal and professional impacts on oncologists, underscoring the need for accessible and structured support.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 93%
- End-of-life care in hematological malignancies – a nationwide comparative study on the Swedish Register of Palliative Care 93%
- From many voices, one question: Community co-design of a population-based qualitative cancer research study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Family physicians supporting patients with palliative care needs within the Patient Medical Home in the community: An Appreciative Inquiry qualitative study 93%
- The Impact on Staff of Providing Non-Invasive Advanced Respiratory Support During the Covid-19 Pandemic A Qualitative Study in an Acute Hospital 93%
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of a natural disaster on access to care and biopsychosocial outcomes among Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors 94%
- Disparities in outcomes among patients diagnosed with cancer associated with emergency department visits 92%
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors affecting COVID-19 outcomes in cancer patients - A first report from Guys Cancer Centre in London 93%
- Underlying reasons for post-mortem diagnosed lung cancer cases – A robust retrospective comparative study from Hungary (HULC study) 89%
- Diagnostic accuracy and safety of coaxial core-needle biopsy (CNB) system in Oncology patients treated in a specialist cancer centre with prospective validation within clinical trial data 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Patient Centered Perspectives on Suicidal Ideation: A Mixed Methods Investigation in Gastrointestinal Cancer Care 95%
- Use of high-plex data reveals novel insights into the tumour microenvironment of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 88%
- Machine learning for prediction of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small cell lung cancer from simple clinical and biological data 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.