Automated Risk Assessment of Amputation in Patients with Peripheral Artery Disease
Milosevic, M.; Demble, T.; Lary, C.; Ross, E. G.; Amal, S.
Show abstract
ObjectivePeripheral artery disease (PAD) affects over eight million Americans and is a leading cause of non-traumatic lower extremity amputation in the United States. Identifying which patients are at highest risk for limb loss can improve the timeliness of intervention to prevent amputation. We wanted to test the predictive performance of machine learning models developed to predict amputations in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) at various intervals of time (60, 120, 180, and 365 days prior to amputation) and across two different clinical datasets. MethodsEach dataset was split into five folds for cross-validation. Afterwards, a hybrid dataset was created to test for transfer learning. We tested three classic machine learning models and a custom deep learning model that were trained using electronic healthcare record (EHR) data from each patient. We evaluated each model for predictive performance at 60, 120, 180, and 365 days ahead of amputation in the All of Us data set. We then evaluated model generalizability by evaluating model performance on an institutional data set STARR. ResultsOur deep learning model had average AUCs of 0.90 (60 days prior to amputation) and 0.89 (120, 180 and 365 days prior to amputation) in the All of Us data set. Models were then externally validated on the STARR dataset, achieving average AUC scores of 0.73 (60 days), 0.71 (120 and 365 days), 0.70 (180 days). ConclusionsOur prognostic deep learning model performs well in predicting risk of amputation up to a year prior. This model also demonstrates promising generalizability by showing strong performance during external validation on a local, institutional dataset. Our deep learning model also adapted the best to the hybrid dataset.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated stratification of trauma injury severity across multiple body regions using multi-modal, multi-class machine learning models 93%
- Learning Decision Thresholds for Risk-Stratification Models from Aggregate Clinician Behavior 93%
- Machine Learning Approaches for Electronic Health Records Phenotyping: A Methodical Review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Continuous-Time and Dynamic Suicide Attempt Risk Prediction with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations 91%
- Predicting critical state after COVID-19 diagnosis: Model development using a large US electronic health record dataset 91%
- Cohort Design and Natural Language Processing to Reduce Bias in Electronic Health Records Research: The Community Care Cohort Project 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Opportunistic Assessment of Ischemic Heart Disease Risk Using Abdominopelvic Computed Tomography and Medical Record Data: a Multimodal Explainable Artificial Intelligence Approach 93%
- Evaluation of Domain Generalization and Adaptation on Improving Model Robustness to Temporal Dataset Shift in Clinical Medicine 92%
- Expert Surgeons and Deep Learning Models Can Predict the Outcome of Surgical Hemorrhage from One Minute of Video 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multicenter Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm for Diagnosing Pediatric Patients with Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome and Kawasaki Disease 91%
- Remote Covid Assessment in Primary Care (RECAP) risk prediction tool: derivation and real-world validation studies 90%
- Novel deep learning algorithm predicts the status of molecular pathways and key mutations in colorectal cancer from routine histology images 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of Cardiovascular Markers and Diseases Using Retinal Fundus Images and Deep Learning: A Systematic Scoping Review 92%
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 91%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.