Back

CLINES: Clinical LLM-based Information Extractionand Structuring Agent

Yang, Z.; Yuan, H.; Sayeed, R.; Tan, A. L. M.; Cai, E.; Moro, M.; Li, X.; Ying, H.; Brown, N.; Weber, G.; Yu, S.; Kohane, I.; Cai, T.

2025-12-02 health informatics
10.64898/2025.12.01.25341355 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClinical narratives in electronic health records (EHRs) contain essential diagnostic, therapeutic, and temporal information that is often missing from structured fields, leaving manual chart review as the de facto standard for high-quality labels, but slow, costly, and variable, thereby constraining accurate cohort construction for clinical trials, large-scale epidemiologic studies, and the development of robust machine-learning models. MethodsWe developed CLINES, a modular agentic pipeline that extracts and structures clinical concepts: semantic chunking of long notes; extraction by reasoningcapable large language models; assignment of attributes (assertion/experiencer, numerical values with SI units); normalization to the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS); resolution of explicit and relative dates; and aggregation into an i2b2-style schema. Zero-shot evaluation was conducted on de-identified EHR: MIMIC-III notes, 4CE notes, and CORAL oncology reports (breast, pancreas). Comparators included rule/lexicon systems, transformer encoders, and single-prompt LLM baselines. Outcomes were F1 scores for entity extraction, assertion status, value&unit extraction, and date processing. FindingsAcross all datasets, CLINES led every baseline. F1 scores (entity / assertion / value&unit / date) were: MIMIC-III 0.69 / 0.93 / 0.90 (date not evaluated); 4CE 0.87 / 0.88 / 0.79 / 0.79; CORAL-Breast 0.81 / 0.84 / 0.77 / 0.73; CORAL-Pancreas 0.85 / 0.87 / 0.90 / 0.78. Gains over the strongest single-prompt LLM were +0.21-0.38 across tasks, and transformer encoders trailed by +0.28-0.68 F1 on entity extraction. Performance remained stable across note-length quantiles, while transformer baselines lost recall as notes lengthened. InterpretationCLINES translates narrative text from electronic health records into ontology-grounded, auditable, and schema-ready data, offering a practical route to scale chart-review-like extraction for cohort discovery and real-world evidence. CLINES is model agnostic-different open and close models can be substituted to achieve specific cost, performance, and privacy goals. Future work aims to quantify inter-annotator agreements and explore adaptive feedback and domain-specific fine-tuning.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.