Performance of the iBox prognostication system in African American kidney transplant recipients: a multicenter study
Truchot, A.; Lombardi, Y.; Raynaud, M.; Aubert, O.; Divard, G.; Thalamas, T.; Astor, B.; Mandelbrot, D.; Parajuli, S.; Newell, K. A.; Orandi, B.; Friedewald, J. J.; Gupta, G.; Akalin, E.; Jordan, S. C.; Matas, A. J.; Molnar, M. Z.; Yamauchi, J.; Fornadi, K.; Bentall, A. J.; Stegall, M. D.; Mannon, R. B.; Segev, D. L.; Huang, E.; Fitzsimmons, W. E.; Loupy, A.
Show abstract
The iBox is a validated prognostication system that predicts graft loss in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), but its performance in the specific population of African American recipients has not been fully studied. We conducted a multicenter study on 3,588 KTRs from North America, including 866 (24.1%) African American KTRs, to assess the impact of race on the iBoxs performance in predicting graft loss. Performance metrics for the prediction of graft loss were similar for both African American and non-African American KTRs in terms of discrimination (C-index 0.81 [95% CI: 0.78-0.84] and 0.83 [95%CI: 0.81-0.85], respectively, p=0.25), and calibration (observed/expected ratio 1.13 [95%CI: 1.03-1.24] and 1.03 [95%CI: 0.95-1.11], respectively, p=0.13). No significant interaction between iBox score values and race was found in multivariate analysis stratified by transplant center (p=0.80 for the interaction term). Results were consistent regardless of the equation used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (Kidney Recipient Specific, CKD-EPI, or MDRD). In conclusion, the iBox prognostication system accurately predicts graft loss up to 7 years post-risk evaluation in African American KTRs and confirms its relevance as a surrogate endpoint in this population.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning-supported interpretation of kidney graft elementary lesions in combination with clinical data 97%
- Direct and indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the survival of kidney transplant recipients: a national observational study in France 96%
- Improving diagnostic performance of kidney allograft rejection with a model combining relative fraction and absolute copies of donor-derived cell-free DNA - results from five independent cohorts 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Mismatches in gene deletions and kidney-related proteins are novel histocompatibility factors in kidney transplantation 97%
- Changing of therapeutic trends between the 1st and 2nd wave did not reduce COVID-19 related mortality of renal transplant recipients: a national registry study 95%
- Urine Test Predicts Kidney Injury and Death in COVID-19 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep learning identifies pathological abnormalities predictive of graft loss in kidney transplant biopsies 97%
- SARS-CoV-2-specific Humoral Immune Responses after A Single dose of Inactivated Whole-virus SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Kidney Transplant Recipients: An Initial Report 92%
- Weak anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response after the first injection of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine in kidney transplant recipients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The impact of competing risks in kidney allograft failure prediction 98%
- Clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential contributes to accelerated chronic kidney disease progression 93%
- Harnessing Expressed Single Nucleotide Variation and Single Cell RNA Sequencing to Define Immune Cell Chimerism in the Rejecting Kidney Transplant 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.