Back

Predictive power of youth diabetes screening guidelines

Halvorson-Fried, S. M.; Vangeepuram, N.; Golestani, N.; Liu, B.

2025-12-05 public and global health
10.64898/2025.12.01.25341261 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionEarly-onset type 2 diabetes (EOD), defined as type 2 diabetes diagnosed before age 45, is a growing public health problem. Adolescence is a critical period for prevention interventions because related health behaviors and biological processes are established during this time. Early screening for type 2 diabetes risk including prediabetes (preDM) could identify youth most in need of intervention but unlike for adults, no questionnaire-based youth risk screeners exist. In this study, we assessed the ability of adapted American Diabetes Association (ADA) screening guidelines in adolescence to predict EOD and prediabetes (preDM/EOD) in adulthood. MethodsWe used data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (Add Health). We applied ADA guidelines (modified to align with available data) in Waves I and II, when participants were 12-19, and assessed ability to predict preDM/EOD in Waves IV and V, when participants were 24-43. We then calculated screening performance measures with (N=13,530) and without (N=14,540) accounting for the survey design. ResultsIn weighted analyses, 40% of participants (5,383) had preDM/EOD based on biomarkers at Waves IV-V. Of these participants, 1,272 were considered at risk according to the ADA screening criteria in Waves I-II (sensitivity=23.6%). Of 8,147 participants without preDM/EOD, 7,218 were not considered at risk in Wave I-II (specificity=88.6%). The screening guidelines had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 57.8% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 63.7%. The F+ and F- measures were 33.5% and 74.1%, respectively. Unweighted analyses produced similar results. ConclusionsAdapted ADA youth screening guidelines demonstrated poor ability to predict preDM/EOD before age 45. Although specificity was high, sensitivity was low: 76% of participants who developed preDM/EOD would not have been identified as at risk in adolescence using the adapted ADA guidelines. Given the high prevalence of preDM/EOD, there is a need for better screening tools to identify youth at risk and better target diabetes prevention interventions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.