Back

Real-Time Sensing of Food Spoilage Using a Recombinant mVenus-Tolles FRET pH Biosensor

Gabay, M.; Sova, M.; Laviv, T.; Gal, M.

2025-12-02 bioengineering
10.64898/2025.11.30.691354 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Monitoring food spoilage is essential for enhancing food safety and reducing waste. pH changes serve as a valuable indicator of microbial activity, and real-time pH monitoring can provide an accurate and non-invasive indication of food spoilage. The pHlameleon chimera proteins were developed for pH sensing by Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) and were extensively used in various biomedical applications. Herein, we evaluate the mVenus-Tolles as a FRET-based biosensor for detecting pH changes as a proxy for food spoilage. The protein was fused to an N-terminal vesicle-nucleating peptide (VNP) tag and recombinantly expressed and purified to homogeneity. Experimental validation demonstrated pH-responsive FRET signal in an array of buffers as well as in a complex food matrix such as chickpea paste, correlating with increasing acidity and microbial growth in food. These findings suggest that this protein-based FRET biosensor holds promise for safe integration into food or packaging for real-time freshness monitoring.

Published in Sustainable Food Technology · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
○ 57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
39.9%
Similar papers in this journal
2
ACS Sensors
● 49 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.9%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
3
ACS Synthetic Biology
● 287 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.8%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Sensors
○ 43 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.4%
Similar papers in this journal
5
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
○ 76 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
Similar papers in this journal
6
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
● 339 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
7
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.4%
8
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
9
Analytical Chemistry
● 218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
10
Microbial Biotechnology
○ 34 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
11
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.0%
12
Talanta
○ 14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
13
Frontiers in Microbiology
○ 427 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.9%
14
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 35%
0.9%
15
Advanced Biology
○ 29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
16
Journal of Immunological Methods
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
17
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
○ 93 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
18
Biochemistry
● 148 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
19
Protein Science
○ 246 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
20
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
○ 21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
21
Biotechnology and Bioengineering
○ 53 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
22
mSystems
● 394 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
23
MicrobiologyOpen
○ 24 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
24
Metabolic Engineering Communications
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
25
Materials Today Bio
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.6%
26
Food Chemistry
○ 13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Advanced Science
○ 286 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.