Back

Weight Loss Dynamics and Health Burden Changes with Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide

Venkatakrishnan, A.; Murugadoss, K.; Soundararajan, V.

2025-12-02 endocrinology
10.64898/2025.11.30.25341294
Show abstract

BackgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used for obesity and type 2 diabetes, yet substantial variability in weight-loss response remains poorly understood. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using de-identified electronic health records and performed 1:1 propensity matching on age, sex, type 2 diabetes status, baseline BMI and weight, index year, and follow-up duration. The matched cohorts included 10,339 tirzepatide-treated and 10,339 semaglutide-treated patients. Patients were categorized by maximum weight loss over two years into five response groups. Adverse events were identified through AI-enabled curation of clinical notes. Weight-loss trajectories, demographic patterns, adverse-event profiles, and pre- to post-treatment disease-prevalence changes were compared across drugs. ResultsPatients treated with tirzepatide lost more weight than those treated with semaglutide (mean reduction, 14.7% vs. 10.8%; p<0.001). High-response rates ([&ge;]15% weight loss in year 1) were nearly doubled with tirzepatide (42.6% vs. 21.6%; p<0.001), accompanied by faster monthly weight-loss velocity (2.54% vs. 2.18%). AI-enabled curation showed that tirzepatide was associated with lower prevalence of gastrointestinal and systemic adverse events. For both tirzepatide and semaglutide, women were more represented among high responders than the minimal weight-loss group (<5% weight loss) and White patients were more represented among high responders, whereas Black and Hispanic patients were more represented among the minimal weight loss group. ConclusionsIn this large, propensity-matched real-world cohort, tirzepatide was associated with greater and faster weight loss than semaglutide. Marked demographic disparities highlight the need for precision approaches to obesity treatment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
based on 14 papers
Top 0.1%
15.2%
2
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
based on 26 papers
Top 0.7%
11.0%
3
Obesity
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
7.5%
4
Frontiers in Endocrinology
based on 20 papers
Top 0.5%
7.5%
5
International Journal of Obesity
based on 17 papers
Top 0.4%
5.8%
6
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 17%
4.6%
50% of probability mass above
7
Diabetologia
based on 23 papers
Top 0.8%
4.4%
8
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
based on 14 papers
Top 0.7%
4.4%
9
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 4%
4.4%
10
Diabetes
based on 14 papers
Top 0.6%
2.9%
11
Diabetes Care
based on 11 papers
Top 0.6%
2.4%
12
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 13%
2.3%
13
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
based on 12 papers
Top 0.5%
2.2%
14
PLOS Medicine
based on 95 papers
Top 7%
1.8%
15
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 78%
1.3%
16
Communications Medicine
based on 63 papers
Top 2%
1.3%
17
British Journal of General Practice
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
1.3%
18
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
19
Clinical and Translational Science
based on 14 papers
Top 2%
1.2%
20
BMJ
based on 49 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
21
Cell Reports Medicine
based on 49 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
22
JAMIA Open
based on 35 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
23
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
based on 45 papers
Top 14%
0.7%
24
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 96%
0.7%
25
npj Digital Medicine
based on 85 papers
Top 15%
0.7%