Back

Weight Loss Dynamics and Health Burden Changes with Tirzepatide versus Semaglutide

Venkatakrishnan, A.; Murugadoss, K.; Soundararajan, V.

2025-12-02 endocrinology
10.64898/2025.11.30.25341294 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGlucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are widely used for obesity and type 2 diabetes, yet substantial variability in weight-loss response remains poorly understood. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using de-identified electronic health records and performed 1:1 propensity matching on age, sex, type 2 diabetes status, baseline BMI and weight, index year, and follow-up duration. The matched cohorts included 10,339 tirzepatide-treated and 10,339 semaglutide-treated patients. Patients were categorized by maximum weight loss over two years into five response groups. Adverse events were identified through AI-enabled curation of clinical notes. Weight-loss trajectories, demographic patterns, adverse-event profiles, and pre- to post-treatment disease-prevalence changes were compared across drugs. ResultsPatients treated with tirzepatide lost more weight than those treated with semaglutide (mean reduction, 14.7% vs. 10.8%; p<0.001). High-response rates ([&ge;]15% weight loss in year 1) were nearly doubled with tirzepatide (42.6% vs. 21.6%; p<0.001), accompanied by faster monthly weight-loss velocity (2.54% vs. 2.18%). AI-enabled curation showed that tirzepatide was associated with lower prevalence of gastrointestinal and systemic adverse events. For both tirzepatide and semaglutide, women were more represented among high responders than the minimal weight-loss group (<5% weight loss) and White patients were more represented among high responders, whereas Black and Hispanic patients were more represented among the minimal weight loss group. ConclusionsIn this large, propensity-matched real-world cohort, tirzepatide was associated with greater and faster weight loss than semaglutide. Marked demographic disparities highlight the need for precision approaches to obesity treatment.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Frontiers in Endocrinology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.8%
4
International Journal of Obesity
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
6
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 37%
4.0%
50% of probability mass above
7
Diabetes Care
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Diabetologia
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
9
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Diabetes
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
Molecular Metabolism
105 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
14
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
15
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
British Journal of General Practice
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
17
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.5%
18
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
19
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
20
eBioMedicine
130 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
21
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 71%
0.9%
22
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
24
The Lancet Healthy Longevity
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
26
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
27
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
28
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
29
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.7%