Back

Genetic Liability for Internalizing-Externalizing Traits in Mexican Youth: Moderation by Adversity

Ceja, Z.; Hung, I.-T.; Thomas, N.; Thorp, J.; Garcia-Marin, L. M.; Cruz-Fuentes, C. S.; Renteria, M. E.; Benjet, C.; Rabinowitz, J. A.; Martinez-Levy, G. A.

2025-12-02 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2025.11.30.25341187 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveWe examined whether common and specific genetic liabilities for internalized (INT) and externalized (EXT) traits predict corresponding disorders in Mexican youth, and whether adversity moderates these associations. MethodsParticipants were 1,130 Mexican adolescents (ages 12-17; 54.9% female). Psychiatric diagnoses and adversities were assessed using the World Mental Health Composite International Diagnostic Interview for Adolescents. Genome-wide association summary statistics for 12 INT and EXT traits were analyzed using genomic structural equation modeling (SEM) to derive polygenic scores (PGS) from latent genetic factors. Associations were tested using multinomial logistic regression. ResultsThe best-fitting genomic SEM bifactor model included one shared internalizing-externalizing factor (INT-EXT-F) and specific factors for internalizing (INT-SF) and externalizing (EXT-SF). Higher INT-EXT-F PGS predicted EXT-only (OR=1.39, 95%CI= 1.16-1.67) and comorbid disorders (OR=1.42, 95% CI= 1.16-1.75). Parental loss moderated associations between EXT-SF PGS and INT-only (OR=1.76, 95% CI= 1.17-2.64) and comorbid disorders (OR=1.79, 95% CI= 1.14-2.81). Cumulative adversity further increased risk, with higher EXT-SF PGS predicting INT (OR= 1.76; 95% CI= 1.17-2.64), EXT (OR= 1.79; 95% CI= (1.14-2.81), and comorbid outcomes (OR= 1.24; 95% CI= 1.04-1.48), and higher INT-EXT-F PGS predicting INT-only disorders (OR= 1.27; 95% CI = 1.07-1.50). ConclusionThese findings emphasize the value of combining genetic and environmental approaches in mental health studies among Mexican youth, broadening the reach and relevance of psychiatric genomic research beyond European populations.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.