Back

Rising resistance to linezolid among critically ill patients calls for model-informed precision dosing in empirical setting

Starp, J.; Leonhardt, A.; Jung, J.; Stoschus, M.; Zoller, M.; Scharf, C.; Zander, J.; Paal, M.; Wicha, S.; Liebchen, U.

2025-12-02 infectious diseases
10.64898/2025.11.28.25340407 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectivesLinezolid is highly valuable for treating infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria that are resistant to first-line agents. Severe infections require empirical therapy, where treatment is initiated before the pathogen and its susceptibility are identified. This evaluation aims to compare different dosing strategies for empirical dosing of linezolid in an intensive care unit (ICU) setting, with the goal of optimising pathogen eradication while minimising toxicities. MethodsThree dosing strategies were compared, all based on two previously published datasets of prospective clinical studies: (i) standard dosing, (ii) therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) guided dosing, and (iii) a theoretical model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) guided by a population pharmacokinetic model using a Bayesian approach. Each scenario was combined with an ICU-specific minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) distribution sampled over ten years and containing over 19,000 pathogens. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic target for pathogen eradication was defined as the minimum concentration above the MIC, and the toxicity limit was set at minimum concentrations exceeding 8 mg/L. ResultsData from 117 critically ill patients with 2184 TDM samples were available. Within the past 10 years, the rate of resistance to linezolid has increased significantly among intensive care patients, rising from 6.3% in 2015 to 11.4-15% between 2021 and 2024. Using standard dosing, only 35.7% of patients were within the target range. This number increased slightly to 46.3% when dose adaptations with TDM were possible. In contrast, MIPD projected target attainment in 70.9-81.3% of patients. ConclusionsIn the era of increasing antimicrobial resistance, particularly against linezolid, novel dosing strategies such as MIPD become urgently necessary. Our results suggest that empirical linezolid dosing based on standard regimens as well as dose adaptation based on TDM failed to achieve sufficient target concentrations in ICU patients. Dosing guided by MIPD should therefore be further explored and implemented in future clinical practice.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.9%
3
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
4
The Lancet Microbe
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Clinical Infectious Diseases
231 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
6
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.0%
8
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.6%
9
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.3%
10
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
134 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
11
European Respiratory Journal
54 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.0%
12
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
14
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.7%
15
Infectious Diseases and Therapy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
16
Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
17
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
18
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
19
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
20
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 69%
0.7%
22
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.7%
23
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
25
Communications Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%