Deep Mediation Analysis for Multimodal Genotype-Imaging Associations with Disease Phenotypes
Golderzahi, V.; Wang, G.-J.; Hu, J.; Yeang, C.-H.
Show abstract
Both genotype and imaging data carry entangled information about the phenotypes. Associations between genotypes and phenotypes can be manifested or absent on biomedical images. While there are abundant multimodal association studies integrating genotype and imaging data, few of them disentangle their direct and indirect effects in associations. We propose GIF (Genotype-Image-Phenotype), a novel modeling framework to predict phenotypes by genotype and imaging data with a mediation structure of these three sets of variables. GIF constitutes a backbone of mediation path genotype[->]image[->]phenotype, and direct genotype[->]phenotype and image[->]phenotype paths capturing the additional direct associations not explained by the mediation model. To implement the mediation model with a convolutional neural network (CNN), we constructed a CNN to predict genotypes with images and then employed the joint embedding vectors of the CNN to predict phenotypes. The direct links were sequentially augmented to the mediation model to further improve prediction accuracy. We validated GIF on three datasets: (1) a synthetic polygon dataset where the presence or absence of a polygon specie indicates a genotype and selected combinations of multiple polygon species indicate phenotypes, (2) the PASCAL VOL dataset of object detection and action recognition, where the presence or absence of an object class indicates a genotype and the presence or absence of an action class indicates a phenotype, (3) the ADNI dataset of Alzheimers disease diagnosis comprising the genotype and imaging data of subjects with three cognitive states. GIF prediction outcomes on the ADNI data indicate the associations between genotypes and phenotypes are primarily mediated by image features, and images provide additional information about phenotypes which is not attributed to genotype variations.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A novel interpretable deep transfer learning combining diverse learnable parameters for improved T2D prediction based on single-cell gene regulatory networks 94%
- Aggregation of Cohorts for Histopathological Diagnosis with Deep Morphological Analysis 94%
- DeepInsight-3D for precision oncology: an improved anti-cancer drug response prediction from high-dimensional multi-omics data with convolutional neural networks 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Compressive Big Data Analytics: An Ensemble Meta-Algorithm for High-dimensional Multisource Datasets 95%
- Complementary Performances of Convolutional and Capsule Neural Networks on Classifying Microfluidic Images of Dividing Yeast Cells 94%
- Deep learning models for COVID-19 chest x-ray classification: Preventing shortcut learning using feature disentanglement 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning universal knowledge graph embedding for predicting biomedical pairwise interactions 94%
- iDRKAN: Interpretable miRNA-Disease Association Prediction Based on Dual-Graph Representation Learning and Kolmogorov-Arnold Network 94%
- DeepGene: An Efficient Foundation Model for Genomics based on Pan-genome Graph Transformer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- MORONET: Multi-omics Integration via Graph Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Data Classification 96%
- Audit to Forget: A Unified Method to Revoke Patients' Private Data in Intelligent Healthcare 94%
- Accurate recognition of colorectal cancer with semi-supervised deep learning on pathological images 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial Transcriptomics Prediction from Histology jointly through Transformer and Graph Neural Networks 95%
- Gene Expression Prediction from Histology Images via Hypergraph Neural Networks 95%
- Species-Agnostic Transfer Learning for Cross-species Transcriptomics Data Integration without Gene Orthology 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.