Back

The trade-offs of sharing pollinators: pollination service is determined by the community context

Cagua, E. F.; Marrero, H. J.; Tylianakis, J. M.; Stouffer, D. B.

2019-12-04 ecology
10.1101/865279 bioRxiv
Show abstract

A fundamental feature of pollination systems is the indirect facilitation and competition that arises when plants species share pollinators. When plants share pollinators, the pollination service can be influenced. This depends not only on how many partners plant species share, but also by multiple intertwined factors like the plant species abundance, visitation, or traits. These factors inherently operate at the community level. However, most of our understanding of how these factors may affect the pollination service is based on systems of up to a handful of species. By examining comprehensive empirical data in eleven natural communities, we show here that the pollination service is--surprisingly--only partially influenced by the number of shared pollinators. Instead, the factors that most influence the pollination service (abundance and visit effectiveness) also introduce a trade-off between the absolute amount of conspecific pollen received and the amount relative to heterospecific pollen. Importantly, the ways plants appear to balance these trade-offs depend strongly on the community context, as most species showed flexibility in the strategy they used to cope with competition for pollination.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The American Naturalist
114 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
25.7%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 10%
7.1%
3
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.8%
4
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.3%
5
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 17%
4.1%
7
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
8
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.6%
9
Evolution
199 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
10
Functional Ecology
53 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.1%
11
Nature Ecology & Evolution
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.9%
12
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.6%
13
Oikos
74 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.3%
14
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
15
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 67%
1.2%
17
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
53 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
18
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
19
Evolutionary Ecology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
21
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.9%
22
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.8%
23
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
24
Ecological Monographs
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
25
Oecologia
23 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
26
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
27
BMC Biology
248 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%