Back

Ecophysiological traits of a clonal grass in its climate change response

Kosova, V.; Hajek, T.; Hadincova, V.; Munzbergova, Z.

2019-12-06 plant biology
10.1101/864827 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundUnderstanding the ability of species to respond to climate change is essential for prediction of their future distribution. When migration is not adequate, reaction via phenotypic plasticity or genetic adaptation is necessary. While many studies investigated the importance of plasticity and genetic differentiation (plant origin) in growth related traits, we know less about differentiation in ecophysiological traits. In addition, the existing studies looking at plant physiology usually do not estimate the consequences of these physiological changes for species performance. MethodsWe used a clonal grass Festuca rubra originating from localities representing factorially crossed gradients of temperatures and precipitations. We cultivated the plants in growth chambers set to simulate temperature and moisture regime in the four most extreme localities. We measured net photosynthetic rate, chlorophyll fluorescence, SLA, osmotic potential, stomatal density and stomatal length as range of ecophysiological traits and tested their relationship to plant fitness measured as ramet number and biomass. Key resultsWe found strong phenotypic plasticity in photosynthetic traits and genetic differentiation in stomatal traits. In most traits, the effects of temperature interacted with the effects of moisture. The relationship between the ecophysiological and fitness-related traits was significant but weak. ConclusionsEcophysiological response of Festuca rubra to climate change is driven by phenotypic plasticity as well as by genetic differentiation indicating potential ability of the populations to adapt to new climatic conditions. The changes in ecophysiological traits translate into plant fitness even though other unmeasured factors also play an important role in fitness determination. Inclusion of species ecophysiology into studies of species adaptation to climate can still increase our ability to understand how species may respond to novel conditions.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.1%
3
AoB PLANTS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
4
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.5%
5
Annals of Botany
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
7
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
8
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
9
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
10
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
11
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
12
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.9%
13
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.9%
15
American Journal of Botany
41 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
Global Change Biology
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.7%
17
Journal of Ecology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
19
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
20
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
21
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
22
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
23
Quantitative Plant Biology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
24
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
25
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.5%
26
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%
27
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
28
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%