Swimming performance traits of twenty-one Australian fish species: a fish passage management tool for use in modified freshwater systems
Watson, J. R.; Goodrich, H. R.; Cramp, R. L.; Gordos, M. A.; Yan, Y.; Ward, P. J.; Franklin, C. E.
Show abstract
Freshwater ecosystems have been severely fragmented by artificial in-stream structures designed to manage water for human use. Significant efforts have been made to reconnect freshwater systems for fish movement, through the design and installation of dedicated fish passage structures (fishways) and by incorporating fish-sensitive design features into conventional infrastructure (e.g. culverts). Key to the success of these structures is making sure that the water velocities within them do not exceed the swimming capacities of the local fish species. Swimming performance data is scarce for Australian fish, which have a reduced swimming capacity when compared to many North American and European species. To help close this knowledge gap and assist fisheries management and civil engineering, we report the swimming performance capacities of twenty-one small-bodied fish and juveniles (< 10 cm) of large bodied species native to Australia as measured by critical swimming speed (Ucrit) and burst swimming speed (Usprint) in a recirculating flume. This data is complemented by endurance swim trials in a 12-meter hydraulic flume channel, and by measures of flume traverse success. Building on the utility of this dataset, we used a panel of morphological, behavioural and ecological traits to first assess their relative contributions to the observed swimming performance data, and second, to determine if they could be used to predict swimming performance capacity - a useful tool to assist in the management of species of conservation concern where access to swimming performance data may be limited. We found that body length combined with depth station (benthic, pelagic or surface) explained most of the interspecific variation in observed swimming performance data, followed by body shape and tail shape. These three traits were the most effective at predicting swimming performance in a model/unknown fish. This data will assist civil engineers and fisheries managers in Australia to mitigate the impact of in-stream structures on local fish populations.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Low light levels increase avoidance behaviour of diurnal fish species: Implications for road culverts 97%
- Ontogeny of escape response and body shape in Threespine Stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus L.) 95%
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding provides enhanced detection of the European eel Anguilla anguilla and fish community structure in pumped river catchments 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Conservation relevant fine scale distribution and habitat associations of threatened elasmobranchs in temperate nearshore waters 96%
- Multiple stressors and recruitment failure of long-lived endangered freshwater mussels with a complex life cycle 94%
- Untangling the Indonesian tangle net fishery: describing a data-poor fishery targeting large threatened rays (Order Batoidea) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electrosensory and metabolic responses of weakly electric fish to changing water conductivity 95%
- Oxygen consumption of drift-feeding rainbow trout: the energetic tradeoff between locomotion and feeding in flow 95%
- The Role of Vision and Lateral Line Sensing for Schooling in Giant Danios (Devario Aequipinnatus) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diffusion tubes: a method for the mass culture of ctenophores and other pelagic marine invertebrates 94%
- Identifying Mangrove-Coral Habitats in the Florida Keys 93%
- Stock identification of Mediterranean horse mackerel (Trachurus mediterraneus) through the analysis of morphometric characters in the Adriatic Sea. 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.