BoxCar Assisted MS Fragmentation (BAMF)
Jenkins, C.; Orsburn, B.
Show abstract
A recent study described the utilization of complex quadrupole isolation schemes to reduce high abundance ion saturation in Orbitrap systems. The BoxCar technique effectively democratizes MS1 scans by restricting high abundance ions from consuming as much space in the trap. This restriction allows lower abundance ions more acquisition time and can increase the signal to noise by a full order of magnitude. While effective at the MS1 level, BoxCar does not show an improvement in MS/MS acquisition as ions selected for fragmentation must come from an additional MS1 full scan in the method. In this study we describe BoxCar Assisted MS Fragmentation (BAMF), wherein ions for fragmentation are selected directly from the BoxCar scans. When utilizing BAMF, we observe the identification of ions by MS/MS that are not at all detectable in the MS1 scans of identical concentrations of peptides analyzed by standard data dependent acquisition experiments. Abstract Graphic O_FIG_DISPLAY_L [Figure 1] M_FIG_DISPLAY C_FIG_DISPLAY
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Parallelized Acquisition of Orbitrap and Astral Analyzers Enables High-Throughput Quantitative Analysis. 98%
- Ultra-sensitive nanoLC-MS of sub nanogram protein samples using second generation micro pillar array LC technology with Orbitrap Exploris 480 and FAIMS PRO 97%
- Super-resolution mass spectrometry enables rapid, accurate, and highly-multiplexed proteomics at the MS2-level 97%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Natural isotope correction improves analysis of protein modification dynamics 96%
- Light contamination in stable isotope-labelled internal peptide standards is frequent and a potential source of false discovery and quantitation error in proteomics 96%
- Label-free Quantification of Host-Cell Protein Impurity in a Recombinant Hemoglobin Reference Material 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.