Back

An epigenetic LTR-retrotransposon insertion in the upstream region of BnSHP1.A9 controls quantitative pod shattering resistance in Brassica napus

Liu, J.; Zhou, R.; Wang, W.; Wang, H.; Raman, R.; Qiu, Y.; Mei, D.; Raman, H.; Hu, Q.

2019-11-29 genetics
10.1101/858407 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Seed loss resulting from pod shattering is a major problem in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) production worldwide. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying pod shatter resistance are not well understood. Here we show that the pod shatter resistance at quantitative trait locus, qSRI.A9.1 is controlled by a SHATTERPROOF1 (SHP1) paralog in B. napus (BnSHP1.A9). Expression analysis by quantitative RT-PCR showed that BnSHP1.A9 was specifically expressed in flower buds, flowers and developing siliques in the oilseed rape line (R1) carrying the qSRI.A9.1 allele with negative effect, but not expressed in any tissue of the line (R2) carrying the positive effect qSRI.A9.1 allele. Transgenic plants constitutively expressing BnSHP1.A9 alleles from pod resistant and pod shattering parental lines showed that both alleles are responsible for pod shattering via promoting lignification of enb layer, which indicated allelic difference of BnSHP1.A9 gene per se is not the causal factor of the QTL. The upstream sequence of BnSHP1.A9 in the promotor region harboring highly methylated long terminal repeat retrotransposon insertion (LTR, 4803bp) in R2 repressed the expression of BnSHP.A9, and thus contributed to the positive effect on pod shatter resistance. Genetic and association analysis revealed that the copia LTR retrotransposon based marker BnSHP1.A9-R2 can be used for breeding for pod shatter resistant varieties and reducing the loss of seed yield in oilseed rape.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.