Adventures in Multi-Omics I: Combining heterogeneous data sets via relationships matrices
Akdemir, D.; Isidro Sanchez, J.
Show abstract
Private and public breeding programs, as well as companies and universities, have developed different genomics technologies which have resulted in the generation of unprecedented amounts of sequence data, which bring new challenges in terms of data management, query, and analysis. The magnitude and complexity of these datasets bring new challenges but also an opportunity to use the data available as a whole. Detailed phenotype data, combined with increasing amounts of genomic data, have an enormous potential to accelerate the identification of key traits to improve our understanding of quantitative genetics. Data harmonization enables cross-national and international comparative research, facilitating the extraction of new scientific knowledge. In this paper, we address the complex issue of combining high dimensional and unbalanced omics data. More specifically, we propose a covariance-based method for combining partial datasets in the genotype to phenotype spectrum. This method can be used to combine partially overlapping relationship/covariance matrices. Here, we show with applications that our approach might be advantageous to feature imputation based approaches; we demonstrate how this method can be used in genomic prediction using heterogenous marker data and also how to combine the data from multiple phenotypic experiments to make inferences about previously unobserved trait relationships. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to harmonize datasets to improve available information across gene-banks, data repositories or other data resources. Key messageSeveral covariance matrices obtained from independent experiments can be combined as long as these matrices are partially overlapping. We demonstrate the usefulness of this methodology with applications in combining data from several partially linked genotypic and phenotypic experiments. Author contribution statement-DA: Conception or design of the work, statistics, R programs, simulations, drafting the article, and critical revision of the article. -JIS: R programs, graphs, drafting the article, critical revision of the article. -RK: Critical revision of the article.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- EnvRtype: a software to interplay enviromics and quantitative genomics in agriculture 96%
- Interpretable Artificial Neural Networks incorporating Bayesian Alphabet Models for Genome-wide Prediction and Association Studies 95%
- Performing Parentage Analysis for Polysomic Inheritances Based on Allelic Phenotypes 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- SimpleMating: R-package for prediction and optimization of breeding crosses using genomic selection 96%
- Introducing CHiDO a No Code Genomic Prediction Software implementation for the Characterization & Integration of Driven Omics 96%
- Imputation of Low-density Marker Chip Data in Plant Breeding: Evaluation of Methods Based on Sugar Beet 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust estimation of heritability and predictive accuracy in plant breeding: evaluation using simulation and empirical data 97%
- Genomic prediction using machine learning: A comparison of the performance of regularized regression, ensemble, instance-based and deep learning methods on synthetic and empirical data 94%
- Preselection of QTL markers enhances accuracy of genomic selection in Norway spruce 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.