Back

Protein adlayer thickness on colloidal nanoparticle determined by Rayleigh-Gans-Debye approximation

Yuan, L.; Zhai, Z.; Chen, L.; Ge, X.; Li, D.; Ge, G.

2019-11-22 biophysics
10.1101/852228 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Reference materials (RM)-assisted Rayleigh-Gans-Debye approximation (rm-RGDA) has been developed and used to in situ determine the size and thickness of the adlayer on the particles in solution. The particle size determined by rm-RGDA is quite close to that measured by electron microscopy but significantly smaller than that measured by DLS. The BSA adlayer absorbed on PS50, PS100 and SiO2 NPs is 3.3, 0.9 and 1.2 nm, respectively, and close to those observed by SEM, which is 4.6, 1.3 and 3.8 nm, respectively. The FTIR analysis results show that the BSA absorbed on larger particles or hydroxyl-abundant surface, e.g. PS100 and SiO2 NPs can lose its secondary structure, e.g. -helix, to a great extent and that absorbed on a more curve surface, e.g. smaller PS50 particles can largely preserve its secondary structure as its free state. The measurement results show the curvature of the NPs is closely related to the structure change of the adsorbed protein. This method provide a facile and new approach to measure the size and its adlayer change of the hybrid and core-shell structured nanoparticles in a wide range of wavelength. SIGNIFICANCEQuantitative study on the adsorption of the protein on colloidal nanoparticles is an important approach to understand the biophysical effect, compared with other ex situ methods such as TEM and SEM, where the specimen are undergone pre-processing and no longer the original state in measurement. It is, therefore, a big challenge. In order to cope with this challenge, UV-vis based RGDA has been developed and applied to in situ measure the size of the dispersed colloidal nanoparticles and their protein adlayer thickness, where the protein adlayer thickness on the colloidal nanoparticles can be easily determined. We believe this method provide a facile and sensitive way to in situ measure the dimension change of hybrid colloidal nanoparticles.

Matching journals

The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.6%
2
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
3
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
4
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.0%
6
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
7
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.8%
8
Nano Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
9
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
10
Journal of Controlled Release
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
12
Biosensors and Bioelectronics
52 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
13
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.9%
50% of probability mass above
14
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
65 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
17
European Biophysics Journal
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
18
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
19
Journal of Nanobiotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.5%
20
ACS Sensors
45 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
21
ACS Nano
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
22
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
23
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
24
Nanoscale
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
25
Journal of Biomedical Optics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
26
Water Research
74 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
27
Biophysical Reports
36 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
28
Food Chemistry
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
29
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
30
Physical Biology
43 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%