Back

Genomic Characterization of SiGRFs in Foxtail Millet and SiGRF1-overexpression in Arabidopsis thaliana Promotes Plant Avoidance of Salt Stress

Liu, J.; Jiang, C.; Kang, L.; Zhang, C.; Song, Y.; Zheng, W.

2019-11-21 genomics
10.1101/849398 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In plants, 14-3-3 proteins are recognized as mediators of signal transduction and function in both development and stress response. However, their functions have not been reported in the C4 crop foxtail millet. Here, phylogenetic analysis categorized foxtail millet 14-3-3s (SiGRFs) into ten discrete groups (Clusters I to {square}). Transcriptome and qPCR analyses showed that all the SiGRFs responded to at least one abiotic stress. All but one SiGRF-overexpressing (OE) Arabidopsis thaliana line (SiGRF1) exhibited insensitivity to abiotic stresses during seed germination and seedling growth. Compared with the Col-0 wild-type, SiGRF1-OEs had slightly lower germination rates and smaller leaves. However, flowering time of SiGRF1-OEs occurred earlier than that of Col-0 under high-salt stress. Interaction of SiGRF1 with a foxtail millet E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (SiRNF1/2) indicates that the proteinase system might hydrolyse SiGRF1. Further investigation showed that SiGRF1 localized in the cytoplasm, and its gene was ubiquitously expressed in various tissues throughout various developmental stages. Additionally, flowering-related genes, WRKY71, FLOWERING LOCUS T, LEAFY and FRUITFULL, in SiGRF1-OEs exhibited considerably higher expression levels than those in Col-0 under salinity-stressed conditions. Results suggest that SiGRF1 hastens flowering, thereby providing a means for foxtail millet to complete its life cycle and avoid further salt stress. HighlightSiGRFs in foxtail millet: SiGRF1 hastens flowering in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana exposed to salt stress

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.1%
2
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.7%
3
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.9%
5
Plant Molecular Biology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.2%
6
The Plant Genome
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
7
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.6%
8
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 50%
2.1%
10
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 48%
2.1%
11
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
12
Genomics
60 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
13
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
16
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
17
Gene
41 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
18
Plant Science
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
22
Journal of Hazardous Materials
19 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
23
Environmental and Experimental Botany
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
24
Life
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
Plant Reproduction
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
26
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
29
Plant And Cell Physiology
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
30
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%