Back

The effect of proximity on the function and energy transfer capability of fluorescent protein pairs

Pope, J.; Johnson, R.; Jamieson, W. D.; Worthy, H.; Kailasam, S.; Auhim, H.; Watkins, D.; Rizkallah, P.; Castell, O.; Jones, D.

2019-11-12 biochemistry
10.1101/838888 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fluorescent proteins (FPs) are commonly used in pairs to monitor dynamic biomolecular events through changes in their proximity via distance dependent processes such as Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). Many FPs have a tendency to oligomerise, which is likely to be promoted through attachment to associating proteins through increases in local FP concentration. We show here that on association of FP pairs, the inherent function of the FPs can alter. Artificial dimers were constructed using a bioorthogonal Click chemistry approach that combined a commonly used green fluorescent protein (superfolder GFP) with itself, a yellow FP (Venus) or a red FP (mCherry). In each case dimerisation changes the inherent fluorescent properties, including FRET capability. The GFP homodimer demonstrated synergistic behaviour with the dimer being brighter than the sum of the two monomers. The structure of the GFP homodimer revealed that a water-rich interface is formed between the two monomers, with the chromophores being in close proximity with favourable transition dipole alignments. Dimerisation of GFP with Venus results in a complex displaying [~]86% FRET efficiency, which is significantly below the near 100% efficiency predicted. When GFP is complexed with mCherry, FRET and mCherry fluorescence itself is essentially lost. Thus, the simple assumptions used when monitoring interactions between proteins via FP FRET may not always hold true, especially under conditions whereby the protein-protein interactions promote FP interaction. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=127 SRC="FIGDIR/small/838888v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1863e41org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@61255dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dc188forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d066ad_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Protein Science
246 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
11.5%
2
Biochemistry
148 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.5%
3
Chemical Communications
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
Chemical Science
73 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
5
ACS Chemical Biology
167 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.0%
6
ChemBioChem
55 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Journal of the American Chemical Society
217 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.9%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 37%
3.1%
9
JACS Au
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.7%
11
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
63 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
12
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
167 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
13
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 11%
2.0%
14
Journal of Molecular Biology
232 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.0%
15
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
88 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.0%
16
ACS Omega
105 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
17
Bioconjugate Chemistry
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
18
Analytical Chemistry
218 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
20
Journal of Biological Chemistry
690 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.4%
21
RSC Chemical Biology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.4%
22
ACS Synthetic Biology
287 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
ACS Sensors
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
24
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
25
ACS Central Science
71 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
26
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
27
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%
28
Nanoscale
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
29
Nucleic Acids Research
1281 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.6%