Back

The effect of proximity on the function and energy transfer capability of fluorescent protein pairs

Pope, J.; Johnson, R.; Jamieson, W. D.; Worthy, H.; Kailasam, S.; Auhim, H.; Watkins, D.; Rizkallah, P.; Castell, O.; Jones, D.

2019-11-12 biochemistry
10.1101/838888 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fluorescent proteins (FPs) are commonly used in pairs to monitor dynamic biomolecular events through changes in their proximity via distance dependent processes such as Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET). Many FPs have a tendency to oligomerise, which is likely to be promoted through attachment to associating proteins through increases in local FP concentration. We show here that on association of FP pairs, the inherent function of the FPs can alter. Artificial dimers were constructed using a bioorthogonal Click chemistry approach that combined a commonly used green fluorescent protein (superfolder GFP) with itself, a yellow FP (Venus) or a red FP (mCherry). In each case dimerisation changes the inherent fluorescent properties, including FRET capability. The GFP homodimer demonstrated synergistic behaviour with the dimer being brighter than the sum of the two monomers. The structure of the GFP homodimer revealed that a water-rich interface is formed between the two monomers, with the chromophores being in close proximity with favourable transition dipole alignments. Dimerisation of GFP with Venus results in a complex displaying [~]86% FRET efficiency, which is significantly below the near 100% efficiency predicted. When GFP is complexed with mCherry, FRET and mCherry fluorescence itself is essentially lost. Thus, the simple assumptions used when monitoring interactions between proteins via FP FRET may not always hold true, especially under conditions whereby the protein-protein interactions promote FP interaction. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=127 SRC="FIGDIR/small/838888v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (25K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1863e41org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@61255dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1dc188forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d066ad_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
ChemBioChem
50 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.3%
2
Chemical Science
71 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.9%
3
Chemical Communications
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
4
Biochemistry
130 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
5
The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
158 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.8%
6
The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters
58 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.5%
7
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
9
Bioconjugate Chemistry
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.0%
10
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.8%
11
ACS Chemical Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
12
Journal of Molecular Biology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.3%
13
Journal of the American Chemical Society
199 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
14
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
34 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
15
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
16
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.7%
17
RSC Chemical Biology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
18
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.5%
19
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
21
Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics
82 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
22
Angewandte Chemie International Edition
81 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
ACS Bio & Med Chem Au
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.9%
24
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
25
Langmuir
31 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
26
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%