Back

Maize Stem Buckling Failure is Dominated by Morphological Factors

Stubbs, C. J.; Larson, R.; Cook, D. D.

2019-11-07 bioengineering
10.1101/833863 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The maize (Zea mays) stem is a biological structure that must both balance biotic and structural load bearing duties. These competing requirements are particularly relevant in the design of new bioenergy crops. With the right balance between structural and biological activities, it may be possible to design crops that are high-yielding and have digestible biomass. But increased stem digestibility is typically associated with a lower structural strength and higher propensity for lodging. This study investigates the hypothesis that geometric factors are much more influential in determining structural strength than tissue properties. To study these influences, both physical and in silico experiments were used. First, maize stems were tested in three-point bending. Specimen-specific finite element models were created based on x-ray computed tomography scans. Models were validated by comparison with in vitro data. As hypothesized, geometry was found to have a much stronger influence on structural stability than material properties. This information reinforces the notion that deficiencies in tissue strength could be offset by manipulation of stalk morphology, thus allowing the creation of stalks with are both resilient and digestible. HighlightThis study utilized physical and in silico experiments to confirm that geometric parameters are far more influential in determining stalk strength than mechanical tissue stiffnesses.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
24 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
2
Journal of Biomechanics
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.0%
3
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
4
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.9%
50% of probability mass above
5
Acta Biomaterialia
92 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.9%
6
Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.6%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.6%
8
Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.1%
9
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.3%
10
Tree Physiology
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
12
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.2%
13
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
15
Bioengineering
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.1%
17
Journal of Experimental Botany
219 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
18
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
20
Journal of Mathematical Biology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
21
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
22
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%