Back

Development of an in vitro Experimental Model for Investigating the Effect of Matrix Stiffness on Epithelial Barrier Permeability

Roy, N.; Turner-Brannen, E.; West, A. R.

2019-11-01 bioengineering
10.1101/828079 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Epithelial cells are well-known to be modulated by extracellular mechanical factors including substrate stiffness. However, the effect of substrate stiffness on an epithelial cells principal function -creating an effective barrier to protect the underlying tissue - cannot be directly measured using existing experimental techniques. We developed a strategy involving ethylenediamine aminolysis and glutaraldehyde crosslinking to chemically graft polyacrylamide hydrogels with tunable stiffness to PET Transwell membranes. Grafting success was evaluated using spectroscopic methods, scrape tests, and extended incubation in culture. By assessing apical to basolateral transfer of fluorescent tracers, we demonstrated that our model is permeable to biologically relevant molecules and usable for direct measurement of barrier function by calculating paracellular permeability.\n\nWe found that BEAS-2B epithelial cells form a more effective barrier on stiff substrates, likely attributable to increased cell spreading. We also observed barrier impairment after treatment with transforming growth factor beta, indicating loss of cell-cell junctions, validating our models ability to detect biologically relevant stimuli. Thus, we have created an experimental model that allows explicit measurement of epithelial barrier function for cells grown on different substrate stiffnesses. This model will be a valuable tool to study mechanical regulation of epithelial and endothelial barrier function in health and disease.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.1%
2
ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering
37 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.0%
3
Cellular and Molecular Bioengineering
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.6%
4
Biomaterials Science
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.0%
5
Biomaterials
78 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
ACS Applied Bio Materials
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
7
APL Bioengineering
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
8
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.4%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 49%
2.1%
10
Lab on a Chip
88 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
11
Annals of Biomedical Engineering
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
Biofabrication
32 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
13
Biomaterials Advances
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
15
Materials Today Bio
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.7%
17
Advanced Healthcare Materials
71 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
18
Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
19
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Small
70 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
22
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
23
ACS Omega
90 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
Integrative Biology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
25
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.7%
26
Advanced Materials Technologies
27 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
27
Fluids and Barriers of the CNS
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
28
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%
29
Tissue Engineering Part A
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.5%