From plant populations to communities: using hierarchical trait environment relationships to reveal within ecosystem filtering
Deschamps, L.; Proulx, R.; Gross, N.; Rheault, G.; Maire, V.
Show abstract
Explaining the existence of highly diverse plant communities under strong abiotic filtering is a long-standing challenge in ecology. Hierarchical aspects of abiotic and biotic filters are rarely taken into account and studies focus mainly on community-level aggregated patterns. Because variations in biotic conditions might take place in short abiotic gradient and within the tolerance of species in regional pool, it is likely that biotic filtering will select individuals within species and adjust population characteristics. To challenge this idea, we replicated a diversity gradient in four highly contrasted wetlands with an almost complete species turn-over, sampling individuals in communities irrespective of their taxonomic identities or status. Using hierarchical distributional modelling, we analyzed the variation of the mean and dispersion of functional trait space at the ecosystem, community and species level. We found that the abiotic differences between ecosystems filtered species contrasted in their growth/nutrient conservation trade-off, while within ecosystems community variation were mainly due to the partitioning of canopy and leaf adaptations to light conditions. We found strong species-specific functional and demographic responses of dominant species along the diversity gradient, especially for traits linked to biomass and space occupation. Two contrasted strategies emerged, with species using plasticity to maintain equally dense populations, while others used plasticity to become overwhelmingly abundant when in favorable conditions. Our results demonstrate that within ecosystems, variation in biotic conditions selects individuals within populations, revealing the importance of phenotypic variation for a species to be maintained in more or less diverse communities. Because phenotypic variations are related to demographic responses, it offers a way to link the study of species diversity and eco-evolutionary dynamics.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast-slow traits predict competition network structure and its response to resources and enemies. 97%
- Predictions of biodiversity are improved by integrating trait-based competition with abiotic filtering 97%
- Nitrogen availability and plant functional composition modify biodiversity-multifunctionality relationships 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional traits predict species responses to environmental variation in a California grassland annual plant community 96%
- Long-term cross-scale comparison of grazing and mowing on plant diversity and community composition in a salt-marsh system 95%
- Vegetation structural complexity uniquely captures competition between vascular plants and bryophytes over succession 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal environmental variation imposes differential selection on genomic and ecological traits of virtual plant communities 95%
- Plant-mycorrhizal associations may explain the latitudinal gradient of plant community assembly 94%
- Assembly history modulates vertical root distribution in a grassland experiment 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inferring ecological selection from multidimensional community trait distributions along environmental gradients 96%
- Tree diversity effects on productivity depend on mycorrhizae and life strategies in a temperate forest experiment 95%
- Partitioning the colonization and extinction components of beta diversity: Spatiotemporal species turnover across disturbance gradients 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Decomposition disentangled: a test of the multiple mechanisms by which nitrogen enrichment alters litter decomposition 94%
- Convergent evolution of niche structure in Northeast Pacific kelp forests 94%
- Flower visitation of alien plants is non-linearly related to phylogenetic and floral similarity to native plants 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.