Back
A pilot exploratory study of the potentials of deep learning methods in cancer image segmentation and classification
Yi, E.; Liu, Y.
2019-11-01
bioinformatics
10.1101/820563
bioRxiv
Show abstract
The authors have withdrawn their manuscript while recent data-sharing permission questions are addressed. Therefore, the authors do not wish this work to be cited as a reference for the project. If you have any questions, please contact the corresponding author.
Matching journals
●Non-profit
◐University press
○Commercial
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
1
PLOS ONE
●
5266 papers in training set
Top 18%
9.8%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 94%
- Fibre tracing in biomedical images: An objective comparison between seven algorithms 94%
- Automated Detection of COVID-19 through Convolutional Neural Network using Chest x-ray images 94%
2
Scientific Reports
○
3612 papers in training set
Top 5%
9.0%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incremental Learning Approach for Semantic Segmentation of Skin Histology Images 95%
- Segmentation of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and surrounding vessels in CT images using deep convolutional neural networks and Texture Descriptors 94%
- ARA: accurate, reliable and active histopathological image classification framework with Bayesian deep learning 94%
3
IEEE Access
●
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
Similar papers in this journal
- SN-FPN: Self-attention Nested Feature Pyramid Network for Digital Pathology Image Segmentation 94%
- A computationally efficient approach to segmentation of the aorta and coronary arteries using deep learning 93%
- Bayesian automatic screening of pneumoniaand lung lesions localization from CT scans. Acombined method toward a more user-centredand explainable approach 93%
5
Sensors
○
43 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.4%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.