Back

State Change Probability: A Measure of the Complexity of Cardiac RR Interval Time Series Using Physiological State Change with Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Chao, H.-H.; Huang, H.-P.; Wei, S.-Y.; Hsu, C. F.; Hsu, L.; Chi, S.

2019-10-24 physiology
10.1101/817650 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The complexity of biological signals has been proposed to reflect the adaptability of a given biological system to different environments. Two measures of complexity--multiscale entropy (MSE) and entropy of entropy (EoE)--have been proposed, to evaluate the complexity of heart rate signals from different perspectives. The MSE evaluates the information content of a long time series across multiple temporal scales, while the EoE characterizes variation in amount of information, which is interpreted as the \"state changing,\" of segments in a time series. However, both are problematic when analyzing white noise and are sensitive to data size. Therefore, based on the concept of \"state changing,\" we propose state change probability (SCP) as a measure of complexity. SCP utilizes a statistical hypothesis test to determine the physiological state changes between two consecutive segments in heart rate signals. The SCP value is defined as the ratio of the number of state changes to total number of consecutive segment pairs. Two common statistical tests, the t-test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test, were separately used in the SCP algorithm for comparison, yielding similar results. The SCP method is capable of reasonably evaluating the complexity of white noise and other signals, including 1/f noise, periodic signals, and heart rate signals, from healthy subjects, as well as subjects with congestive heart failure or atrial fibrillation. The SCP method is also insensitive to data size. A universal SCP threshold value can be applied, to differentiate between healthy and pathological subjects for data sizes ranging from 100 to 10,000 points. The SCP algorithm is slightly better than the EoE method when differentiating between subjects, and is superior to the MSE method.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Biomedical Signal Processing and Control
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
18.9%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.0%
50% of probability mass above
4
Physiological Measurement
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.4%
5
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.6%
6
IEEE Access
31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
BioMed Research International
25 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
8
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.1%
9
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
11
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.2%
12
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
13
Chaos, Solitons & Fractals
32 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
14
Mathematical Biosciences and Engineering
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
15
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
16
Physiological Reports
35 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
17
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
18
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.7%
19
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 32%
0.5%
20
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%
21
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
22
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 19%
0.5%
23
Molecules
37 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%