Back

eMED-DNA: An in silico operating system for clinical medical data storage within the human genome

Jakaria, M.; Sarker, K.; Uddin, M. R.; Islam, M. M.; Das, T.; Bayzid, M. S.; Shakur, R.

2019-10-23 bioinformatics
10.1101/814830 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The propitious developments in molecular biology and next generation sequencing have enabled the possibility for DNA storage technologies. However, the full application and power of our genomic revolution have not been fully utilized in clinical medicine given a lack of transition from research to real world clinical practice. This has identified an increasing need for an operating system which allows for the transition from research to clinical use. We present eMED-DNA, an in silico operating system for archiving and managing all forms of electronic health records (EHRs) within ones own copy of the sequenced genome to aid in the application and integration of genomic medicine within real world clinical practice. We incorporated an efficient and sophisticated in-DNA file management system for the lossless management of EHRs within a genome. This represents the first in silico integrative system which would bring closer the utopian ideal for integrating genotypic data with phenotypic clinical data for future medical practice.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Bioinformatics
◐ 1204 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
22.3%
Similar papers in this journal
2
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 2%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Nature Communications
○ 5641 papers in training set
Top 27%
5.5%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Nucleic Acids Research
◐ 1281 papers in training set
Top 4%
5.1%
Similar papers in this journal
5
NAR Genomics and Bioinformatics
◐ 242 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
6
Genome Research
● 468 papers in training set
Top 1%
4.3%
7
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 22%
4.3%
Similar papers in this journal
50% of probability mass above
8
GigaScience
◐ 212 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.0%
9
Genome Biology
○ 637 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.0%
10
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.0%
11
BMC Bioinformatics
○ 457 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.4%
12
PLOS Computational Biology
● 1863 papers in training set
Top 10%
3.2%
13
Nature Computational Science
○ 55 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.4%
14
Nature Methods
○ 385 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.4%
15
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
16
Patterns
○ 78 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
17
Nature Biotechnology
○ 172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
18
Database
◐ 61 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
19
Cell Systems
○ 201 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
20
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
◐ 71 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Journal of Molecular Biology
○ 232 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
22
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
● 20 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
23
BioData Mining
○ 22 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
24
Cell Reports Methods
○ 165 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.