Beyond traditional biodiversity fish monitoring: environmental DNA metabarcoding and simultaneous underwater visual census detect different sets of a complex fish community at a marine biodiversity hotspot
Valdivia-Carrillo, T.; Rocha-Olivares, A.; Reyes-Bonilla, H.; Dominguez-Contreras, J. F.; Munguia-Vega, A.
Show abstract
Significant advances in the study of marine fish communities have been achieved with traditional monitoring methods and recently with novel genetic approaches. eDNA metabarcoding is one of them and a powerful tool for the study of biodiversity still in continuous development. Its applicability in marine ecology and conservation studies may be gauged by comparing its results with those of traditional methods. In the present investigation, we compare results from the underwater visual census (UVC) with eDNA metabarcoding (eDNA) carried out simultaneously in 24 rocky reef sites along the Gulf of California. We developed a two-PCR library preparation protocol followed by high throughput sequencing aimed at teleost fish. Our results show that both methods had different detection capabilities, and each registered different sets of fish taxa from rocky reefs, with some overlap. In particular, eDNA identified taxa from pelagic, demersal, and estuarine habitats beyond the rocky reef itself, suggesting differences in detection mainly attributed to the transport and permanence time of the eDNA in the ocean. Overlap in the detection with both methods increased with taxonomic level. We argue that substantial gaps in sequence reference databases for teleost are at the root of major discrepancies. Our results also confirm that PCR-based eDNA metabarcoding of seawater samples does not reflect patterns in abundance and biomass of species estimated from traditional methods. We discuss how to reconcile the results of eDNA metabarcoding and traditional methods in marine hotspots.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing the utility of marine filter feeders for environmental DNA (eDNA) biodiversity monitoring 98%
- Enhancing metabarcoding efficiency and ecological insights through integrated taxonomy and DNA reference barcoding: a case study on beach meiofauna 98%
- The long and the short of it: Nanopore based eDNA metabarcoding of marine vertebrates works; sensitivity and specificity depend on amplicon lengths 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- Water volume, biological and PCR replicates influence the characterization of deep-sea pelagic fish communities. 98%
- Environmental DNA reveals fine scale spatial and temporal variation of prey species for marine mammals in a Scottish marine protected area 98%
- Environmental DNA metabarcoding for biodiversity monitoring of a highly-diverse tropical fish community in a coral-reef lagoon: Estimation of species richness and detection of habitat segregation 98%
Similar papers in this journal
- eDNA metabarcoding shows highly diverse but distinct shallow, mid-water, and deep-water eukaryotic communities within a marine biodiversity hotspot 98%
- Nuclear eDNA Metabarcoding Primers for Anthozoan Coral Biodiversity Assessment 97%
- Influence of DNA extraction kits on freshwater fungal DNA metabarcoding 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Considerations for metabarcoding-based port biological baseline surveys aimed at marine non-indigenous species monitoring and risk-assessments 97%
- How many replicates to accurately estimate fish biodiversity using environmental DNA on coral reefs? 97%
- Sampling The Zebrafish Gut Microbiota - A Genome Resolved Metagenomic Approach 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- eDNA metabarcoding vs metagenomics: an assessment of dietary competition in two estuarine pipefishes 96%
- From sea surface to seafloor: a benthic allochthonous eDNA survey for the abyssal ocean 96%
- An assessment of environmental metabarcoding protocols aiming at favouring contemporary biodiversity in inventories of deep-sea communities 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.