Back

Genetic diversity and structure of sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) in France: At the intersection between Spain and Italy

Bouffartigue, C.; Debille, S.; Fabreguettes, O.; Ramos Cabrer, A.; Pereira-Lorenzo, S.; Flutre, T.; Harvengt, L.

2019-10-08 genetics
10.1101/792259 bioRxiv
Show abstract

ContextRenewed interest in European chestnut in France is focused on finding locally adapted populations partially resistant to ink disease and identifying local landraces. AimsWe genotyped trees to assess (i) the genetic diversity of wild and cultivated chestnut across most of its range in France, (ii) their genetic structure, notably in relation with the sampled regions, and (iii) relations with its neighbors in Spain and Italy. MethodsA total of 693 trees in 16 sampling regions in France were genotyped at 24 SSRs, and 1,401 trees in 17 sampling regions at 13 SSRs. ResultsGenetic diversity was high in most sampling regions, with redundancy between them. No significant differentiation was found between wild and cultivated chestnut. A genetic structure analysis with no a priori information found a low, yet significant structure, and identified two clusters. One cluster gathers trees from south-east France and Corsica (RPP1) and another cluster gathers trees from all other sampled regions (RPP2). A substructure was detected at 13 SSRs suggesting differentiation within both RPP1 and RPP2. RPP1 was split between south-east France and Corsica. RPP2 was split between north-west France, Aveyron, Pyrenees and a last cluster gathering individuals from several other regions. ConclusionThe genetic structure within and between our sampling regions is likely the result of natural events (recolonization after the last glaciation) and human activities (migration and exchanges). Notably, we provide evidence for a common origin of most French and Iberian chestnut trees, except those from south-east France that were associated with the Italian gene pool. This advances our knowledge of chestnut genetic diversity and structure, will benefit conservation and help our local partners valorization efforts.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.