Back

Factors influencing read coverage variation in a genome assembled using short reads

Wang, P.; Meng, F.; Moore, B. M.; Shiu, S.-H.

2019-10-02 genomics
10.1101/790337 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Availability of genome sequences has led to significant advance in biology. With few exceptions, the great majority of existing genome assemblies are derived from short read sequencing technologies with highly uneven read coverages indicative of sequencing and assembly issues. In tomato, 0.6% (5.1 Mb) and 9.7% (79.6 Mb) of short-read based assembly had significantly higher and lower coverage compared to background, respectively. We established machine learning models capable of predicting genomic regions with variable coverages and found that high coverage regions tend to have lower simple sequence repeat but higher tandem gene densities compared to background regions. To determine if the high coverage regions were misassembled, we examined a recently available long-read based assembly and found that 27.8% (1.41 Mb) of high coverage regions were potentially mis-assembled of duplicate sequences, compared to 1.4% in background regions. In addition, using a machine learning model that can distinguish correctly and incorrectly assembled high coverage regions, we found that misassembled, high coverage regions tend to be flanked by simple sequence repeats, pseudogenes, and transposon elements. Our study provides insights on the causes of variable coverage regions and a quantitative assessment of factors contributing to misassembly when using short reads.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.