CellWell: A micropatterned biphasic nanocomposite platform for culturing chondrocytes
Saraswat, R.; Ratnayake, I.; Perez, E. C.; Schutz, W. M.; Zhu, Z.; Ahrenkiel, S. P.; Wood, S. T.
Show abstract
Graphical Abstract\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=77 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/790030v1_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (25K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e0a6c0org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@e3b9f7org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@c60cb6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@6cb884_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG AbstractWe present a unique micropatterned nanocomposite cell culture platform to model articular cartilage that is suitable for high-throughput single-cell analyses using standard imaging techniques. This platform, the CellWell, is constructed out of a thin, optically transparent substrate that is lithographically micropatterned with a network of wells sized to fit individual cells. The substrate material consists of a thin layer of agarose hydrogel embedded with polyvinyl alcohol nanofibers. The geometries of the wells are designed to reinforce a physiological morphology, thereby combining the physiological advantages of 3D culture systems with the practical advantages of 2D systems. CellWells were found to have compressive moduli of 144 {+/-} 11.5 kPa and 158 {+/-} 0.6 kPa at strain rates of 5 m/s and 15 m/s. The compressive moduli were determined at two different strain rates to allow for comparison of CellWell stiffness with published values of pericellular matrix and with observed values of articular cartilage, which could not be indented at the same rate. Articular chondrocytes seeded in a CellWell were found to maintain their spheroidal morphology more effectively than those seeded in monolayer cultures and to be more easily imaged than those seeded in a 3D scaffold of identical thickness. Through its ease of use and ability to maintain the physiological morphology of chondrocytes, we expect that the CellWell will enhance the clinical translatability of future studies conducted using this culture platform.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- 3D Bioprinting of Graphene Oxide-Incorporated Cell-laden Bone Mimicking Scaffolds for Promoting Scaffold Fidelity, Osteogenic Differentiation and Mineralization 96%
- Generative design approach to combine architected Voronoi foams with porous collagen scaffolds to create a tunable composite biomaterial 96%
- Effects of Controlled Dual Growth Factor Delivery on Bone Regeneration Following Composite Bone-Muscle Injury 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Alginate-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting, Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Osteogenesis, and Application for Patient-Specific Bone Grafts 97%
- Extracellular Matrix Hydrogels Promote Expression of Muscle-Tendon Junction Proteins 96%
- Tendon-derived biomimetic surface topographies induce phenotypic maintenance of tenocytes in vitro 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Anatomical meniscus construct with zone specific biochemical composition and structural organization 97%
- Mechanical activation drives tenogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells in aligned dense collagen hydrogels 96%
- An in vitro Chondro-osteo-vascular Triphasic Model of the Osteochondral Complex 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.