Back

Long-term research needed to avoid spurious and misleading trends in sustainability attributes of no-till

Cusser, S.; Bahlai, C.; Swinton, S. M.; Robertson, G. P.; Haddad, N. M.

2019-10-08 ecology
10.1101/788240 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Agricultural management recommendations based on short-term studies can produce findings inconsistent with long-term reality. Here, we test the long-term relative profitability and environmental sustainability of continuous no-till agriculture practices on crop yield, soil moisture, and N2O fluxes. Using a moving window approach, we investigate the development and stability of several attributes of continuous no-till as compared to conventional till agriculture over a 29-year period at a site in the upper Midwest, U.S. We find that over a decade is needed to detect the consistent benefits of no-till on important attributes at this site. Both crop yield and soil moisture required periods 15 years or longer to generate patterns consistent with 29-year trends. Only marginally significant trends for N2O fluxes appeared in this period. Importantly, significant but misleading short-term trends appeared in more than 20% of the periods examined. Relative profitability analysis suggests that 10 years after initial implementation, 86% of periods recuperated the initial expense of no-till implementation, with the probability of higher relative profit increasing with longevity. Results underscore the essential importance of decade and longer studies for revealing the long-term dynamics and emergent outcomes of agricultural practices for different sustainability attributes and are consistent with recommendations to support the long-term adoption of no-till management.\n\nGRAPHICAL ABSTRACT\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=187 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/788240v1_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (42K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e7529eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e11268org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17f8995org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2196fe_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HIGHLIGHTSO_LIWe test long-term effects of no-till on yield, soil moisture, and N2O fluxes\nC_LIO_LIWe examine 29 years of data with a moving window and relative profitability method\nC_LIO_LIIt takes at least a decade to detect consistent benefits of no-till\nC_LIO_LIShorter studies can produce significant but misleading findings\nC_LIO_LILong studies are essential to reveal the dynamics of agricultural management\nC_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
19.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.3%
3
Environmental Research Letters
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.0%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
7
Journal of Environmental Management
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
8
Forest Ecology and Management
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.6%
9
Journal of Applied Ecology
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.1%
10
Ecological Applications
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.6%
11
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.3%
12
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
2.1%
13
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.7%
14
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
15
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
17
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
18
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
19
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
20
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
22
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 43%
0.8%
23
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.7%
24
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
FACETS
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.6%