Back

Long-term research needed to avoid spurious and misleading trends in sustainability attributes of no-till

Cusser, S.; Bahlai, C.; Swinton, S. M.; Robertson, G. P.; Haddad, N. M.

2019-10-08 ecology
10.1101/788240 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Agricultural management recommendations based on short-term studies can produce findings inconsistent with long-term reality. Here, we test the long-term relative profitability and environmental sustainability of continuous no-till agriculture practices on crop yield, soil moisture, and N2O fluxes. Using a moving window approach, we investigate the development and stability of several attributes of continuous no-till as compared to conventional till agriculture over a 29-year period at a site in the upper Midwest, U.S. We find that over a decade is needed to detect the consistent benefits of no-till on important attributes at this site. Both crop yield and soil moisture required periods 15 years or longer to generate patterns consistent with 29-year trends. Only marginally significant trends for N2O fluxes appeared in this period. Importantly, significant but misleading short-term trends appeared in more than 20% of the periods examined. Relative profitability analysis suggests that 10 years after initial implementation, 86% of periods recuperated the initial expense of no-till implementation, with the probability of higher relative profit increasing with longevity. Results underscore the essential importance of decade and longer studies for revealing the long-term dynamics and emergent outcomes of agricultural practices for different sustainability attributes and are consistent with recommendations to support the long-term adoption of no-till management.\n\nGRAPHICAL ABSTRACT\n\nO_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=187 SRC=\"FIGDIR/small/788240v1_ufig1.gif\" ALT=\"Figure 1\">\nView larger version (42K):\norg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e7529eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1e11268org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17f8995org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2196fe_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG HIGHLIGHTSO_LIWe test long-term effects of no-till on yield, soil moisture, and N2O fluxes\nC_LIO_LIWe examine 29 years of data with a moving window and relative profitability method\nC_LIO_LIIt takes at least a decade to detect consistent benefits of no-till\nC_LIO_LIShorter studies can produce significant but misleading findings\nC_LIO_LILong studies are essential to reveal the dynamics of agricultural management\nC_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 12%
15.3%
3
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
5
Journal of Applied Ecology
39 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Science of The Total Environment
186 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.3%
7
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.3%
8
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.3%
9
Basic and Applied Ecology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.5%
11
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.5%
12
Plant Direct
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.1%
13
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 50%
1.9%
15
Journal of Economic Entomology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
16
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
17
Forest Ecology and Management
27 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
18
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.5%
19
Plant Methods
42 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
20
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
22
Journal of Ecology
49 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
23
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.9%
24
Plant Physiology
238 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Global Change Biology
78 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%