Functional and in-silico interrogation of rare genomic variants impacting RNA splicing for the diagnosis of genomic disorders
Ellingford, J. M.; Thomas, H. B.; Rowlands, C.; Arno, G.; Beaman, G.; Gomes-Silva, B.; Campbell, C.; Gossan, N.; Hardcastle, C.; Webb, K.; O'Callaghan, C.; Hirst, R. A.; Ramsden, S.; Jones, E.; Clayton-Smith, J.; Webster, A. R.; Genomics England Research Consortium, ; O'Keefe, R. T.; Newman, W. G.; Black, G. C.
Show abstract
PurposeTo develop a comprehensive analysis framework to identify pre-messenger RNA splicing mutations in the context of rare disease.\n\nMethodsWe assessed variants of uncertain significance through six in-silico prioritization strategies. Firstly, through comparison to functional analyses, we determined the precise effect on splicing of variants identified through clinical multi-disciplinary meetings. Next, we calculated the sensitivity of in-silico prioritization strategies to distinguish known splicing mutations from common variation (>2% in allele frequency in gnomAD) within relevant disease genes. These approaches defined an accurate in-silico strategy for variant prioritization, which we retrospectively applied to a large cohort of 2783 individuals who had previously received genomic testing for rare genomic disorders. We assessed the clinical impact of such prioritization strategies alongside routine diagnostic testing strategies.\n\nResultsWe identified 21 variants that potentially impacted splicing, and used cell based splicing assays to identify those variants which disrupted normal splicing. These findings underpinned new molecular diagnoses for 14 individuals. This process established that the use of pre-defined thresholds from a machine learning splice prediction algorithm, SpliceAI, was the most efficient method for variant prioritization, with a positive predictive value of 86%. We analysed 1,346,744 variants identified through diagnostic testing for 2783 individuals and observed that splicing variant prioritization strategies would improve clarity in clinical analysis for 15% of the individuals surveyed. Prioritized variants could provide new molecular diagnoses or provide additional support for molecular diagnosis for up to 81 individuals within our cohort.\n\nConclusionWe present an in-silico and functional analysis framework for the assessment of variants impacting pre-messenger RNA splicing which is applicable across monogenic disorders. Incorporation of these strategies improves clarity in diagnostic reporting, increases diagnostic yield and, with the advent of targeted treatment strategies, can directly alter patient clinical management.\n\nKey HighlightsO_LIWe establish an in-silico and functional analysis framework for the incorporation of splice variant assessment into diagnostic testing that is applicable across monogenic disorders.\nC_LIO_LIAfter assessment of six distinct variant prioritization strategies, we concluded that SpliceAI was the best method to accurately identify genomic variation disrupting normal pre-mRNA splicing. We determined this through (i) functional assessment of novel variants of uncertain significance described in this study, and (ii) calculation of sensitivity and specificity for prioritization strategies to distinguish known splicing mutations from common variants in the general population.\nC_LIO_LIWe describe novel disease-causing variants with support from cell based functional assays which underpin autosomal recessive, autosomal dominant and X-linked Mendelian disorders. This includes variants which are deeply intronic, within the nearby splice region of canonical splice sites and variants which activate cryptic splice sites within the protein-coding regions of genes.\nC_LIO_LIWe integrated the best performing variant prioritization strategy alongside clinical diagnostic testing for 2783 individuals referred to a well-established targeted gene panel test available through the UK National Health Service. We show that integration of such strategies will increase accuracy and clarity of diagnostic reporting, including the identification of variants which could provide new diagnoses and new carrier findings for referred individuals.\nC_LIO_LIFunctional assessment is essential for accurate clinical assessment of variants disrupting pre-mRNA splicing. We show through cell based functional assessments that variants impacting splicing may have complex impacts on pre-mRNA splicing, which may cause multiple interpretable consequences according to ACMG guidelines.\nC_LI
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Utility of genome sequencing and group-enrichment to support splice variant interpretation in Marfan syndrome 97%
- Genome sequencing reveals the impact of non-canonical exon inclusions in rare genetic disease 96%
- Assessment of the variant prioritisation strategy for genomic newborn screening in the Generation Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- AutoPVS1: An automatic classification tool for PVS1 interpretation of null variants 96%
- Using single molecule Molecular Inversion Probes as a cost-effective, high-throughput sequencing approach to target all genes and loci associated with macular diseases 94%
- Whole genome sequencing of ‘mutation-negative’ individuals with Cornelia de Lange Syndrome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Advanced variant classification framework reduces the false positive rate of predicted loss of function (pLoF) variants in population sequencing data 96%
- Genome Sequencing and Comprehensive Rare Variant Analysis of 465 Families with Neurodevelopmental Disorders 95%
- Exome copy number variant detection, analysis and classification in a large cohort of families with undiagnosed rare genetic disease 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- EyeG2P: an automated variant filtering approach improves efficiency of diagnostic genomic testing for inherited ophthalmic disorders 95%
- A comparative medical genomics approach may facilitate the interpretation of rare missense variation 95%
- Assessing performance of pathogenicity predictors using clinically-relevant variant datasets 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.