Pharmacogenetic variants associated with off-target adverse drug reactions are mostly predicted to be benign
Andrews, T. D.; McConnell, H.; Field, M. A.
Show abstract
Tools that predict the functional importance of genetic variation almost always rely on sequence conservation across deep evolutionary divergences as a primary discriminator. However, sequence conservation information is misleading when predicting the functional importance of pharmacogenetic variants related to off-target adverse drug reactions. Sequence conservation is largely maintained by evolutionary purifying selection, which has not been relevant for most drugs until very recently, especially for off-target effects. Here, we use a simple classification criteria to identify variants with off-target pharmacogenetic effects from the PharmGKB database. We show that off-target pharmacogenetic variation is predicted mostly to be benign by all state-of-the-art prediction tools we tested. Hence, off-target pharmacogenetic variants are overwhelmingly invisible to all predictive methodologies currently employed. Very different analytical approaches will be needed to address this important problem.\n\nAuthor SummaryWhen a personal genome sequence is obtained for a given person, the sequence is compared to the human reference sequence to identify where it differs from the genome of that person. One application of this information is that it may identify how a specific person may react to particular drugs. However, when computationally predicting the functional importance of a genetic variant, the tools used rely heavily on sequence conservation information to make their prediction. From an evolutionary point of view, the use of drugs to treat diseases is a very recent activity - and one that has not had time to cause certain variants to either be selected for or removed from the population. This produces a blind-spot for tools that predict variant functional effects, especially for drugs with off-target interactions that may produce unanticipated effects.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacogenetic allele variant frequencies: An analysis of the VAs Million Veteran Program (MVP) as a representation of the diversity in US population. 94%
- Curated Multiple Sequence Alignment for the Adenomatous Polyposis Coli (APC) Gene and Accuracy of In Silico Pathogenicity Predictions 93%
- Analyzing the Performance of Deep Learning Splice Prediction Algorithms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pharmacogenetics at scale: An analysis of the UK Biobank 93%
- SLCO1B1 functional variants and statin-induced myopathy in people with recent genealogical ancestors from Africa: a population-based real-world study 92%
- Biobank scale pharmacogenomics informs the genetic underpinnings of simvastatin use 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structure-informed classification of RyR1 variants highlights limitations of current predictors and enables clinical interpretation 93%
- REVEL is better at predicting pathogenicity of loss-of-function than gain-of-function variants 92%
- Splicing impact of deep exonic missense variants in CAPN3 explored systematically by minigene functional assay 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.