Back

Prospective evaluation of beta-lactamase detection in penicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus by interpretation of the penicillin disc edge

Henderson, A.; Whiley, D.; Francis, F.; Engler, C.; Glover, M.; Douglas, J.; Gore, L.; Harris, P. N. A.; Paterson, D.; Nimmo, G. R.; Norton, R.

2019-09-26 microbiology
10.1101/776880 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Penicillin susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (PSSA) may occasionally be encountered as a cause of complicated S. aureus infection, such as endocarditis or bloodstream infections. Clinicians may choose to treat these patients with penicillin over a semi-synthetic penicillin derivative, such as flucloxacillin or oxacillin, due to a favourable Pk/Pd profile. In this study, we prospectively evaluated the penicillin disc (1-IU) method for detection of blaZ, with interpretation of the penicillin edge according to EUCAST recommendations. 472 PSSA isolates were collected between September 2014 to December 2015 from three clinical microbiology laboratories in Queensland, Australia. Initial antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by the Vitek 2 system. Real-time PCR for blaZ was performed following phenotypic testing with the 1-IU penicillin disc and the PCR used as the gold standard for detection of penicillinase. The prevalence of blaZ amongst the isolates was 7%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of the penicillin disc method was 97%, 95%, 61% and 100% when compared to blaZ PCR. In summary, the penicillin disc zone size and edge interpretation is a reliable method for detection of blaZ in S. aureus isolates that otherwise test susceptible to penicillin by Vitek 2 AST.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
120 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.2%
2
Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
43 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
3
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
167 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
9.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Journal of Infection
71 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.2%
5
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.7%
6
Microbiology Spectrum
435 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.5%
7
JAC-Antimicrobial Resistance
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Journal of Medical Microbiology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 60%
1.7%
12
Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.3%
13
Journal of Applied Microbiology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
14
Journal of Hospital Infection
27 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
15
Eurosurveillance
80 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
19
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
20
Biomedicines
66 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
22
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Antibiotics
32 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
Health Science Reports
12 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
25
Clinical Microbiology and Infection
60 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
26
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%