Back

Efficient use of harvest data: An integrated population model for exploited animal populations

Gamelon, M.; Baubet, E.; Besnard, A.; Gaillard, J.-M.; Lebreton, J.-D.; Touzot, L.; Veylit, L.; Gimenez, O.

2019-09-19 ecology
10.1101/776104 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIMany populations are affected by hunting or fishing. Models designed to assess the sustainability of harvest management require accurate estimates of demographic parameters (e.g. survival, reproduction) hardly estimable with limited data collected on exploited populations. The joint analysis of different data sources with integrated population models (IPM) is an optimal framework to obtain reliable estimates for parameters usually difficult to estimate, while accounting for imperfect detection and observation error. The IPM built so far for exploited populations have integrated count-based surveys and catch-at-age data into ageclass structured population models. But the age of harvested individuals is difficult to assess and often not recorded, and population counts are often not performed on a regular basis, limiting their use for the monitoring of exploited populations.\nC_LIO_LIHere, we propose an IPM that makes efficient use of data commonly collected in exploited marine and terrestrial populations of vertebrates. As individual measures of body mass at both capture and death are often collected in fish and terrestrial game species, our model integrates capture-mark-recapture-recovery data and data collected at death into a body mass-structured population model. It allows the observed number of individuals harvested to be compared with the expected number and provides accurate estimates of demographic parameters.\nC_LIO_LIWe illustrate the usefulness of this IPM using an emblematic game species distributed worldwide, the wild boar Sus scrofa, as a case study. For this species that has increased in distribution and abundance over the last decades, the model provides accurate and precise annual estimates of key demographic parameters (survival, reproduction, growth) and of population size while accounting for imperfect detection and observation error.\nC_LIO_LITo avoid an overexploitation of declining populations or an under-exploitation of increasing populations, it is crucial to gain a good understanding of the dynamics of exploited populations. When managers or conservationists have limited demographic data, the IPM offers a powerful framework to assess population dynamics. Being highly flexible, the approach is broadly applicable to both terrestrial and marine exploited populations for which measures of body mass are commonly recorded and more generally, to all populations suffering from anthropogenic mortality causes.\nC_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
29.9%
2
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
7.0%
3
Journal of Animal Ecology
75 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.5%
4
Population Ecology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
5
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
176 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
5.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Ecosphere
57 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.3%
7
Ecological Modelling
28 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
8
Movement Ecology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
10
The American Naturalist
125 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.3%
11
Ecology
85 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
2.3%
12
Ecological Applications
34 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
13
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
14
Ecology Letters
135 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
15
Heredity
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
16
Animal Conservation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Ecography
54 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.1%
18
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 57%
1.1%
19
Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Ecological Monographs
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
21
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
22
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
393 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.0%
23
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 76%
0.8%
24
Oikos
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%