Back

Drug-Target Interaction prediction using Multi-Graph Regularized Deep Matrix Factorization

Mongia, A.; Majumdar, A.

2019-09-19 bioinformatics
10.1101/774539 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Drug discovery is an important field in the pharmaceutical industry with one of its crucial chemogenomic process being drug-target interaction prediction. This interaction determination is expensive and laborious, which brings the need for alternative computational approaches which could help reduce the search space for biological experiments. This paper proposes a novel framework for drug-target interaction (DTI) prediction: Multi-Graph Regularized Deep Matrix Factorization (MGRDMF). The proposed method, motivated by the success of deep learning, finds a low-rank solution which is structured by the proximities of drugs and targets (drug similarities and target similarities) using deep matrix factorization. Deep matrix factorization is capable of learning deep representations of drugs and targets for interaction prediction. It is an established fact that drug and target similarities incorporation preserves the local geometries of the data in original space and learns the data manifold better. However, there is no literature on which the type of similarity matrix (apart from the standard biological chemical structure similarity for drugs and genomic sequence similarity for targets) could best help in DTI prediction. Therefore, we attempt to take into account various types of similarities between drugs/targets as multiple graph Laplacian regularization terms which take into account the neighborhood information between drugs/targets. This is the first work which has leveraged multiple similarity/neighborhood information into the deep learning framework for drug-target interaction prediction. The cross-validation results on four benchmark data sets validate the efficacy of the proposed algorithm by outperforming shallow state-of-the-art computational methods on the grounds of AUPR and AUC.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.0%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 22%
7.8%
3
Bioinformatics
1204 papers in training set
Top 3%
7.8%
4
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
5
BMC Bioinformatics
457 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 7%
5.5%
7
Computers in Biology and Medicine
128 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
5.1%
50% of probability mass above
8
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
37 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
9
Journal of Computational Biology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
242 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
11
Bioinformatics Advances
203 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
12
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.6%
13
IEEE Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
14
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
15
Journal of Biomedical Informatics
47 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.5%
16
GigaScience
212 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
17
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
238 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
IEEE Access
35 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
19
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
20
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 15%
0.8%
21
BioData Mining
22 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
22
Journal of Medical Internet Research
87 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
24
Computational Biology and Chemistry
28 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%