Back

Library of model implementations for sharing deep-learning image segmentation and outcomes models

Apte, A. P.; Iyer, A.; Thor, M.; Pandya, R.; Haq, R.; Shukla-Dave, A.; Hu, Y.-C.; Elguindi, S.; Veeraraghavan, H.; Oh, J. H.; Jackson, A.; Deasy, J. O.

2019-09-19 bioinformatics
10.1101/773929 bioRxiv
Show abstract

An open-source library of implementations for deep-learning based image segmentation and outcomes models is presented in this work. As oncology treatment planning becomes increasingly driven by automation, such a library of model implementations is crucial to (i) validate existing models on datasets collected at different institutions, (ii) automate segmentation, (iii) create ensembles for improving performance and (iv) incorporate validated models in the clinical workflow. The library was developed with Computational Environment for Radiological Research (CERR) software platform. CERR is a natural choice to centralize model implementations due to its comprehensiveness, popularity, and ease of use. CERR provides well-validated feature extraction for radiotherapy dosimetry and radiomics with fine control over the calculation settings. This allows users to select the appropriate feature calculation used in the model derivation. Models for automatic image segmentation are distributed via Singularity containers, with seamless i/o to and from CERR. Singularity containers allow for segmentation models to be deployed with a variety of scientific computing architectures. Deployment of models is driven by JSON configuration file, making it convenient to plug-in models. Models from the library can be called programmatically for batch evaluation. The library includes implementations for popular radiotherapy models outlined in the Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic effort and recently published literature. Radiomics models include features from Image Biomarker Standardization features found to be important across multiple sites and image modalities. Deep learning-based image segmentation models include state of the art networks such as Deeplab and other problem-specific architectures. The library is distributed as GNU-copyrighted software at https://www.github.com/cerr/CERR.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Physics in Medicine & Biology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
40.4%
2
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.6%
3
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 35%
4.1%
5
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.7%
6
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 11%
3.2%
7
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.4%
8
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
9
Radiotherapy and Oncology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.7%
12
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.5%
13
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.5%
14
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.4%
15
Medical Physics
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
16
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
17
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
18
Gigabyte
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
20
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics
38 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
22
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
23
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
45 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
24
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.5%