Minimally invasive, pressure probe based sampling allows for in-situ gene expression analyses in plant cells.
Wada, H.; Castellarin, S. D.; Matthews, M. A.; Shackel, K. A.; Gambetta, G. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundGene expression analyses are conducted using multiple approaches and increasingly research has been focused on assessing gene expression at the level of a tissue or even single-cells. To date, methods to assess gene expression at the single-cell in plant tissues have been semi-quantitative, require tissue disruption, and/or involve laborious, possibly artifact-inducing manipulation. In this work, we used grape berries (Vitis vinifera L. Zinfandel) as a model in order to examine the validity and reproducibility of an in-situ gene expression analysis method combining a cell pressure probe (CPP) with quantitative PCR (qPCR).\n\nResultsWe developed a method to directly assess gene expression levels via qPCR from cellular fluids sampled in-situ with a CPP. Cellular fluids, with volumes in the picoliter range, were collected from intact berries with a CPP at various depths across skin and mesocarp tissues. The expression of a key anthocyanin biosynthetic gene, UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (VviUFGT), was analyzed as a test case since its expression is restricted to cells producing anthocyanins in grape berry skins during ripening. The method identifies samples contaminated with significant levels of genomic DNA by amplifying a region of VviUFGT that spans an intron. Therefore false positives were discarded which occurred in 28% of the samples tested. Shallow probing of skin cells showed high VviUFGT expression as expected while deeper probing of mesocarp cells resulted in no VviUFGT expression.\n\nConclusionsThe clear correspondence of VviUFGT expression to the targeted cell samples suggests that the in-situ gene expression analysis using a CPP is reliable and does not result in contamination as the probe moves through tissues. This method can be paired to single-cell transcriptomic analyses in the future. We conclude that this technique represents a minimally invasive method of sampling plant cells in-situ which creates an opportunity for the analysis of cellular level, spatiotemporal responses in heterogeneous plant tissues.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accelerating leaf area measurement using a volumetric approach 95%
- Visualization of spatial gene expression in plants by modified RNAscope fluorescent in situ hybridization 94%
- Big data from small tissues: extraction of high-quality RNA for different plant tissue types during oilseed Brassica spp. seed development for RNA-Sequencing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exogenous application of non-mature miRNA-encoded miPEP164c inhibits proanthocyanidin synthesis and stimulates anthocyanin accumulation in grape berry cells 96%
- The modified activity of prolyl 4 hydroxylases (P4Hs) reveals the effect of arabinogalactan proteins (AGPs) on changes in the cell wall during the tomato ripening process 95%
- Temporal Gene Expression in Apical Culms Shows Early Changes in Cell Wall Biosynthesis Genes in Sugarcane 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative transcriptomic analysis reveals key components controlling spathe color in Anthurium andraeanum (Hort.) 95%
- Improving yield and fruit quality traits in sweet passion fruit: evidence for genotype by environment interaction and cross-compatibility in selected genotypes 94%
- Genome-wide DNA polymorphisms in four Actinidia arguta genotypes based on whole-genome re-sequencing 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The genetics of fruit skin separation in date palm 94%
- A Sense of Place: Transcriptomics Identifies Environmental Signatures in Cabernet Sauvignon Berry Skins in the Late Stages of Ripening. 94%
- Transcriptomic analysis of temporal shifts in berry development between two grapevine cultivars of the Pinot family reveals potential genes controlling ripening time 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.