Back

Minimally invasive, pressure probe based sampling allows for in-situ gene expression analyses in plant cells.

Wada, H.; Castellarin, S. D.; Matthews, M. A.; Shackel, K. A.; Gambetta, G. A.

2019-09-14 plant biology
10.1101/768978 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundGene expression analyses are conducted using multiple approaches and increasingly research has been focused on assessing gene expression at the level of a tissue or even single-cells. To date, methods to assess gene expression at the single-cell in plant tissues have been semi-quantitative, require tissue disruption, and/or involve laborious, possibly artifact-inducing manipulation. In this work, we used grape berries (Vitis vinifera L. Zinfandel) as a model in order to examine the validity and reproducibility of an in-situ gene expression analysis method combining a cell pressure probe (CPP) with quantitative PCR (qPCR).\n\nResultsWe developed a method to directly assess gene expression levels via qPCR from cellular fluids sampled in-situ with a CPP. Cellular fluids, with volumes in the picoliter range, were collected from intact berries with a CPP at various depths across skin and mesocarp tissues. The expression of a key anthocyanin biosynthetic gene, UDP-glucose: flavonoid 3-O-glucosyltransferase (VviUFGT), was analyzed as a test case since its expression is restricted to cells producing anthocyanins in grape berry skins during ripening. The method identifies samples contaminated with significant levels of genomic DNA by amplifying a region of VviUFGT that spans an intron. Therefore false positives were discarded which occurred in 28% of the samples tested. Shallow probing of skin cells showed high VviUFGT expression as expected while deeper probing of mesocarp cells resulted in no VviUFGT expression.\n\nConclusionsThe clear correspondence of VviUFGT expression to the targeted cell samples suggests that the in-situ gene expression analysis using a CPP is reliable and does not result in contamination as the probe moves through tissues. This method can be paired to single-cell transcriptomic analyses in the future. We conclude that this technique represents a minimally invasive method of sampling plant cells in-situ which creates an opportunity for the analysis of cellular level, spatiotemporal responses in heterogeneous plant tissues.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
32.9%
2
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
12.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 19%
10.1%
50% of probability mass above
4
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.0%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 31%
4.0%
6
Planta
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
7
Plants
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
3.6%
8
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
9
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
10
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.5%
11
BMC Plant Biology
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.3%
12
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
13
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
14
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
16
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 13%
0.9%
17
Agronomy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
18
Physiologia Plantarum
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
20
BioTechniques
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
22
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
23
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
46 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
24
G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics
351 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
25
Genes
126 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%