Genetic correlations across genetically determined and developmentally plastic alternative reproductive tactics
Abbott, J. K.; Rios-Cardenas, O.; Morris, M. R.
Show abstract
Alternative reproductive tactics occur when individuals of the same sex have a suite of morphological and/or behavioural traits that allow them to pursue different reproductive strategies. A common pattern is e.g. the existence of \"courter\" and \"sneaker\" tactics within males. We have previously argued that alternative reproductive tactics should be subject to genetic conflict over the phenotypic expression of traits, similar to sexual antagonism. In this process, which we called intra-locus tactical conflict, genetically determined tactics experience conflicting selection on a shared phenotypic trait, such as body size, but a positive genetic correlation between tactics in body size prevents either tactic from reaching its optimum. Recently, other authors have attempted to extend this idea to developmentally plastic alternative reproductive tactics, with mixed results. However, it is not clear whether we should expect intra-locus tactical conflict in developmentally plastic tactics or not. We have therefore run a series of simulation models investigating under what conditions we should expect to see positive estimates of the inter-tactical genetic correlation, since a positive genetic correlation is a prerequisite for the existence of intra-locus tactical conflict. We found that for autosomal, X-linked, and Y-linked genetically-determined tactics, estimated inter-tactical genetic correlations were generally high. However, for developmentally plastic tactics, the genetic correlation depends on the properties of the switching threshold between tactics. If it is fixed, then estimated genetic correlations are positive, but if there is genetic variation in the switch-point, then any sign and magnitude of estimated genetic correlation is possible, even for highly heritable traits where the true underlying correlation is perfect. This means that caution should be used when investigating genetic constraints in plastic phenotypes.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Selection on sperm size in response to promiscuity and variation in female sperm storage organs 96%
- Hoisted with his own petard: how sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila affinis creates resistance alleles that limit its spread 95%
- Genotype x Environment interaction and the evolution of sexual dimorphism: adult nutritional environment mediates selection and expression of sex-specific genetic variance in D. melanogaster 95%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.