Back

Engineering a functional NifDK polyprotein resistant to mitochondrial degradation

Allen, R. S.; Gregg, C. M.; Okada, S.; Menon, A.; Hussain, D.; Gillepsie, V.; Johnston, E.; Warden, A. C.; Taylor, M.; Colgrave, M.; Byrne, K.; Wood, C.

2019-09-03 synthetic biology
10.1101/755116 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To engineer Mo dependent nitrogenase function in plants expression of proteins NifD and NifK will be an absolute requirement. Although mitochondria have been established as a suitable eukaryotic environment for biosynthesis of oxygen-sensitive enzymes such as NifH, expression of NifD in this organelle has proven difficult due to cryptic NifD degradation. Here we describe a solution to this problem. Using molecular and proteomic methods, we found NifD degradation to be a consequence of mitochondrial endoprotease activity at a specific motif within NifD. Focusing on this functionally sensitive region, we designed NifD variants comprising between one and three amino acid substitutions and distinguished several that were resistant to degradation when expressed in both plant and yeast mitochondria. Nitrogenase activity assays of these resistant variants in E. coli identified a subset that retained function, including a single amino acid (Y100Q) variant. The Y100Q variant also enabled expression of a NifD(Y100Q)-linker-NifK translational polyprotein in plant mitochondria, confirmed by identification of the polyprotein in the soluble fraction of plant extracts. The NifD(Y100Q)-linker-NifK retained function in E. coli based nitrogenase assays, demonstrating this polyprotein permits expression of NifD and NifK in a defined stoichiometry supportive of activity. Our results exemplify how protein design can overcome impediments encountered when expressing synthetic proteins in novel environments. Specifically, these findings outline our progress toward the assembly of the catalytic unit of nitrogenase within mitochondria.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.